Does the Integral from 8 to 666 of 1/((x^(1/3))-2) Converge or Diverge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SteliosVas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral ∫1/((x^(1/3))-2)dx from 8 to 666, focusing on determining whether it converges or diverges. The subject area involves integral calculus and the behavior of functions within specified limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the continuity of the integrand over the interval and the implications for using the fundamental theorem of calculus. There are attempts to clarify the limits of integration and the nature of the singularity at x=2. Some participants suggest using substitutions to simplify the integrand and explore comparison tests for convergence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations of the problem's requirements. Some participants have offered substitution methods and raised questions about the nature of the singularity at x=8, while others have expressed confusion about the original problem statement and its implications for convergence analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted issue with the integrand being undefined at certain points, particularly at x=2 and x=8, which is central to the discussion on convergence. Participants are navigating the implications of these points on the evaluation of the integral.

SteliosVas
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
∫1/((x^1/3)-2)dx between b=666 and a=8

Aim is to prove divergence or convergence

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay so I know I can prove for 4x1/3 < x when 8 < x but I don't know where to go from here. There is obviously very large terminal values, and i know you could say evalute each terminal values using fundamental theorem of calculus..

Any easier way to do it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integrand is not continuous over [a, b], so you can't use the fundamental theorem of calculus (directly).

Try the substitution u^3 = x and write the integrand in terms of u. Make sure you change the limits of integration, too. Then try v = u - 2. Then things will look a little more obvious.
 
The original problem appears to be to integrate from 2 to 666. There is, of course, a problem at x= 2 but since the problem does NOT require integration to infinity, I do not understand Ray Vickson's "(ii) whether the function grows small quickly enough to yield a finite integration as the upper limit goes to infinity."
 
HallsofIvy said:
The original problem appears to be to integrate from 2 to 666. There is, of course, a problem at x= 2 but since the problem does NOT require integration to infinity, I do not understand Ray Vickson's "(ii) whether the function grows small quickly enough to yield a finite integration as the upper limit goes to infinity."

I had mid-read the original problem; there is no issue at the lower end ##x = 2##. And, somehow, I thought that the OP was trying to figure out whether the integral ##\int_ a^{\infty} f(x) \, dx## exists, by looking at ##\int_a^b f(x) \, dx## for some large, finite ##b = 666## and trying to get a conclusion or insight from that. However, when I go back and re-read the original, I see that no such statement seems to have been made, so the question is actually a more-or-less pointless exercise except, of course, for actually doing the integral, which is elementary, but tedious. Anyway, I deleted my previous post.
 
But there is an issue at x= 2 where the integrand is not defined.
 
Ray Vickson said:
I had mid-read the original problem; there is no issue at the lower end ##x = 2##.
I agree that there is no problem at x = 2, but the original integral is over the interval [8, 666], and there is a problem at x = 8.
Ray Vickson said:
And, somehow, I thought that the OP was trying to figure out whether the integral ##\int_ a^{\infty} f(x) \, dx## exists, by looking at ##\int_a^b f(x) \, dx## for some large, finite ##b = 666## and trying to get a conclusion or insight from that. However, when I go back and re-read the original, I see that no such statement seems to have been made, so the question is actually a more-or-less pointless exercise except, of course, for actually doing the integral, which is elementary, but tedious. Anyway, I deleted my previous post.
HallsofIvy said:
The original problem appears to be to integrate from 2 to 666.
No, the original integral is ##\int_8^{666}\frac {dx}{\sqrt[3]{x} - 2}##
HallsofIvy said:
There is, of course, a problem at x= 2 but since the problem does NOT require integration to infinity, I do not understand Ray Vickson's "(ii) whether the function grows small quickly enough to yield a finite integration as the upper limit goes to infinity."
 
Okay essentially all I want to prove is convergence or divergence of the integral over the [8,666]. I know no problem exists for x=2 but rather the problem exists at x=8

Using substitution as u= x1/3 and x= x3 i get ∫3*u2/(u-2)

I than reapply v = u-2 and and therefore u = v + 2 and integrate respectively. But my challenge is, think it is asking you to use some sort of comparison rather than evaluating the integral to calculate the convergence/divergence? Would the comparison test work?
 
Last edited:
Bump
 
Once you have the integral 3\int \frac{u^2}{u- 2} du do the division to get 3\int (v+ 2+ \frac{4}{v-2})dx. The first two terms are easily integrable and you can "compare" the last to integrating \frac{1}{x} in the vicinity of x= 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K