Does the Motion of Electrons in a Wire or Charged Metal Sphere Produce EM Waves?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tmv3v
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating Charges
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether the motion of electrons in a wire or a charged metal sphere produces electromagnetic (EM) waves. Participants explore various scenarios, including the effects of constant and varying currents, the implications of gravitational acceleration, and the conditions under which radiation may be emitted. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects of electromagnetism and the behavior of charges in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that an accelerating charge emits EM waves, while others question whether electrons in a circular wire with constant speed emit radiation due to changing direction.
  • One participant asserts that a ring with a constant current does not emit EM waves because the contributions from all electrons cancel each other.
  • Another participant suggests that increasing voltage in a straight wire leads to electron acceleration, potentially resulting in radiation, but emphasizes the need for detailed analysis to determine the nature of the emitted waves.
  • There is discussion about the conditions under which a charged metal sphere might emit EM waves when dropped, with some noting that gravitational acceleration complicates the scenario.
  • Participants explore the implications of accelerating a wire horizontally and whether this can be treated similarly to accelerating charges, raising questions about frame of reference and radiation detection.
  • Some participants mention that electrical appliances emit very low-frequency radiation, relating this to the frequency of the power grid.
  • There is a suggestion that all matter, containing charged particles, should theoretically emit EM waves, although the radiation is typically very small.
  • One participant highlights the complexity of applying the equivalence principle in scenarios involving radiation from uniformly accelerated charges.
  • Several participants express a desire for resources to better understand these concepts, indicating a lack of consensus on the underlying principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the motion of electrons in the discussed scenarios produces EM waves. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the conditions necessary for radiation emission and the implications of different types of acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific configurations of wires and currents, the need for numerical simulations to analyze radiation, and unresolved questions about the nature of radiation from accelerating charges.

tmv3v
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
So we know that an accellerating charge will emit EM waves.

Consider putting a voltage through a circular wire. Electrons are traveling in the wire with constant speed but their velocity is changing constantly as it is changing direction due to the shape of the wire. Now does that mean the electron will emit EM waves?

Consider another scenario, we now have a charged metal sphere. Does it emit EM wave if we let it drop to the ground?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A ring with a constant current does not emit EM waves - the contributions from all electrons together cancel each other.
Consider another scenario, we now have a charged metal sphere. Does it emit EM wave if we let it drop to the ground?
The gravitational acceleration triggered a lot of discussion, and as far as I know, there is no clear answer yet.
 
how about..

how about a straight wire and you turn up the voltage making electrons accelerate?
 
You need some time-dependence in the current, otherwise it will not work.
 
So as you increase voltage constantly,
your current increases comstantly, and therefore the electrons are accelerating in the wire with constant acceleration (dV/dt = c>0 dI/dt > 0 dv/dt = a >0). So what kind of EM wave do the electrons emit?
 
That should give some radiation. What do you mean with "what kind of EM wave"? The frequency will depend on the setup, and I doubt that it is possible to give an answer without a detailed analysis (and probably a numerical simulation).
 
Oh because I can't image how radiation will be given off by a piece of wire. Say we increase the voltage from 1V to 12V in 12seconds, so that dV/dt = 1, and we connect a copper wire to the adjustable power source, where the copper wire has a radius of 5mm. What radiation will the electrons from the wire give off?
 
dV/dt = 1 [highlight]V/s[/highlight]
Actually, 11/12 and not 1.

It is impossible to answer this without knowledge of the cable shape, and probably numerical simulations (and nobody wants to do them unless it has some real application, I think). The circuit will emit a tiny amount of extremely-low-frequency radiation.
 
So it actually emits radiation, and I think every electrical appliances we use will emit very low frequency radiation too? Also, how about if we accelerate a piece of wire horizontally (say we hold the wire and run across the room). Can we treat this as acceleration of a charge? If we can, and another person is observing this, will he see the radiation but I will not because I am in the same frame of reference as the wire?
 
  • #10
So it actually emits radiation, and I think every electrical appliances we use will emit very low frequency radiation too?
Sure. The dominant contribution has the same frequency as the power grid, usually 50 or 60 Hz.
Also, how about if we accelerate a piece of wire horizontally (say we hold the wire and run across the room).
If the wire is charged or has charged parts, it will radiate a bit.

The existence of radiation is frame-independent. You are not in an inertial frame if you accelerate.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
A ring with a constant current does not emit EM waves - the contributions from all electrons together cancel each other.

Is there a good place to read a detailed description of this? I assume it is a quantum effect. I tutor and teach at the lower undergraduate and High School level, and I have been asked this a couple of times about this which seems like a reasonable question to me (or maybe I'm just forgetting something obvious). Since I don't fully understand why this is the case, I didn't want to make up a misleading analogy.
 
  • #12
Mmm.. interesting! 50-60Hz is in the radio wave range so we should get a small interference when we turn on the radio with a lot of electrical appliances operating around us!

I am just wondering, what is the difference between putting an increasing current through a wire and accelerating the whole wire horizontally as when you consider electrons in the wire they are accelerating in space in both cases?

Good point about frame-independent:D Yeah I forgot that EM waves travel at the speed of light in all frame of reference!
 
  • #13
DrewD said:
Is there a good place to read a detailed description of this? I assume it is a quantum effect. I tutor and teach at the lower undergraduate and High School level, and I have been asked this a couple of times about this which seems like a reasonable question to me (or maybe I'm just forgetting something obvious). Since I don't fully understand why this is the case, I didn't want to make up a misleading analogy.

Yes I totally agree! Once you are taught about an accelerating charge will emit EM waves, you will recall what you have learnt, eg:

1) electrons in circuits (in fact positive holes in metals as well)
2) Electrons orbiting a positive nucleus (we know that they are not really orbiting and it is all about probability when you get into college physics/chemistry but there is still a chance for the electrons to accelerate)
3) In fact all matter contains electrons and protons, meaning everything emits EM waves then?

If it is true well we know that the radiation is very small that it is hard to have an effect. However in theory radiation should exist for any charged particles (as they all have some probability to accelerate).
 
  • #14
DrewD said:
Is there a good place to read a detailed description of this? I assume it is a quantum effect.
A classical description works fine here.
Textbooks about electromagnetism should cover this in some way.

tmv3v said:
Mmm.. interesting! 50-60Hz is in the radio wave range so we should get a small interference when we turn on the radio with a lot of electrical appliances operating around us!
Radios operate in the range of several kHz to many MHz, some orders of magnitude above the frequency of the power grid.
I am just wondering, what is the difference between putting an increasing current through a wire and accelerating the whole wire horizontally as when you consider electrons in the wire they are accelerating in space in both cases?
Don't forget the protons, and the direction and magnitude of acceleration.
3) In fact all matter contains electrons and protons, meaning everything emits EM waves then?
[...]
However in theory radiation should exist for any charged particles (as they all have some probability to accelerate).
Blackbody radiation...
 
  • #15
tmv3v said:
So as you increase voltage constantly,
your current increases comstantly, and therefore the electrons are accelerating in the wire with constant acceleration (dV/dt = c>0 dI/dt > 0 dv/dt = a >0). So what kind of EM wave do the electrons emit?

Do a search on "Do Uniformly Accelerated Charges Radiate?". You may be surprised at the different answers to this.
 
  • #16
If the issue is taking radiation due to uniform acceleration of a charge (assuming you can somehow maintain uniform acceleration by applying an external force, because the charge solely on its own will undergo back reaction from the radiation due to the Abraham-Lorentz self force and will cease to undergo uniform acceleration) and then applying the equivalence principle to get what is ostensibly a nonsensical answer, note that you cannot apply the equivalence principle in such a case because the mass-energy distribution is not localized (the electromagnetic field carried by the charge extends out to infinity).
 
  • #17
Is there a good place to read a detailed description of this? I assume it is a quantum effect. I tutor and teach at the lower undergraduate and High School level, and I have been asked this a couple of times about this which seems like a reasonable question to me (or maybe I'm just forgetting something obvious). Since I don't fully understand why this is the case, I didn't want to make up a misleading analogy.
Actually, it is simple consequence of the Maxwell equations. If the currents are stationary (do not vary in time), there is no production of radiation from them.

You can learn this from a nice book : Mark A. Heald, Jerry B. Marion: Classical Electromagnetic Radiation.
 
  • #18
Jano L. said:
Actually, it is simple consequence of the Maxwell equations. If the currents are stationary (do not vary in time), there is no production of radiation from them.

You can learn this from a nice book : Mark A. Heald, Jerry B. Marion: Classical Electromagnetic Radiation.

The classical description doesn't apply if you are considering electrons which would emit radiation due to their acceleration around a loop of wire. I assume it has something to do with indistinguishability of electrons in the conduction band, but I don't know much about solid state physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K