High School Does the Order of insulating layers matter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kaguro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter
Click For Summary
The order of insulating layers A and B significantly affects heat transfer, especially when their thermal inertias are considered. If layer A is a poor conductor and layer B is a better conductor, placing B closer to the heat source enhances heat retention, while the reverse order leads to faster cooling. The geometry of the system, such as whether it is flat or cylindrical, also plays a crucial role in determining heat transfer rates. In cylindrical configurations, the inner layer's conductivity impacts the overall heat flow, with better conductivity yielding higher transfer rates when positioned closer to the heat source. Ultimately, the arrangement of insulating layers can influence the system's temperature stability under varying external conditions.
Kaguro
Messages
221
Reaction score
57
TL;DR
If a system is covered by two layers of different heat conductivities, would their order matter in how much net heat is lost?
Given a system with some heat capacity. It is at any temperature T, and it is covered by two layers A and B. Say layer A is poor conductor of heat and B is comparatively better.

If we let the system sit in a matrix of lower temperature for some time (long enough for heat to pass through A but not long enough that our system comes in equilibrium with the surrounding temperature..), does the final temperature of system depend on ordering of layers A and B?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you saying that the thermal inertial of A and B is significant, or just the thermal inertia of the system? Is the boundary of the system flat (slab) or is the boundary curved?
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
I would like to know what happens with each of the cases you mentioned.

First let's consider that the heat capacities of A and B are not significant. What in that case?

And if their heat capacities are significant, then what?

Also, why would the shape of the boundary matter here? The heat released should be proportional to the exposed surface area and not on the shape.
 
Let's say the system is a cylinder (i.e., curved surface), and the thicknesses of the insulating layers are equal, and on the same order as the radius of the pipe. Then, in the case where the thermal inertias of the insulating layers are negligible, the same amount of heat flows through the insulating layers per unit time, but the inner layer has more resistance, because the heat is distributed over a smaller average surface area. So, switching the order of the layers will affect the rate of heat transfer. OK so far?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DaveE
If I am trying to keep in, at say 20 C, and outside it's 0 C, suppose one material X has a high heat transmission near 20 C and low everywhere else, and the other Y has a high heat transmission near 0 C and low everywhere else. If I have X near the interior and Y near the exterior it will cool faster than the reverse.

However, such materials are unusual and laboratory curiosities. They usually (possibly always) involve a phase change.

Google "heat diode" for more.

Apart from this, @Chestermiller is right - geometry is the driving factor.
 
Given geometric conditions of equality on a flat surface

A_1 = A_2 = A

Y

x_1 = x_2 = x

For the same temperature difference the inversion of the layers results in the same rate of transfer of energy or heat.

Q = \dfrac {A (T_i-T_e) k_1k_2}{x (k_1 + k_2)} = \dfrac {A (T_i-T_e) \mu}{x}

\mu = \dfrac {k_1k_2}{k_1 + k_2} = \dfrac {1}{\dfrac {1}{k_1} + \dfrac {1}{k_2}}

The difference lies in the fact that the temperature at the junction interface between materials is subjected to different temperatures, tm is higher if the material with the highest thermal conductivity is the one exposed to the source of the highest temperature.

heattransfer.png


But in cylindrical condition

R_ {avg1} = R_i + \dfrac {x}{2}

R_ {avg2} = R_i + \dfrac {3x}{2}

A_1 \cong2 \pi R_ {avg1} L

A_2 \cong2 \pi R_ {avg2} L

A_2> A_1

e = R_i + x-R_i = R_i + 2x- (R_i + x) = x

then if the material with the highest conductivity is internal

k_1> k_2

if the material with the highest conductivity is in the inner layer

Q_A = \dfrac {T_i-T_e}{x} \dfrac {k_1 A_1 k_2 A_2}{k_1A_1 + k_2A_2}

if the material with the highest conductivity is in the outer layer

Q_B = \dfrac {T_i-T_e}{x} \dfrac {k_1 A_1 k_2 A_2}{k_1A_2 + k_2A_1}

If we make the ratio of both equations

\dfrac {Q_A}{Q_B} = \dfrac{k_1A_2 + k_2A_1}{k_1A_1 + k_2A_2}

Replacing what their surfaces are worth

\dfrac {Q_A}{Q_B} = \dfrac {k_1 (R_i + \dfrac {3x}{2}) + k_2 (R_i + \dfrac {x}{2})}{k_1 (R_i + \dfrac {x}{2}) + k_2 (R_i + \dfrac {3x}{2})}

Distributing and ordering

\dfrac {Q_A}{Q_B} = \dfrac {(k_1 + k_2) R_i + \dfrac {x}{2} (k_1 + k_2 + 2k_1)}{(k_1 + k_2) R_i + \dfrac {x}{ 2} (k_1 + k_2 + 2k_2)}

So if k_1> k_2 is satisfied

It follows that \dfrac {Q_A}{Q_B}> 1

Then Q_A> Q_B there is a better transfer rate if the smallest surface area is the one with the highest conductivity and is in contact with the hottest fluid
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 135 ·
5
Replies
135
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K