Is There Evidence for Handedness in the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The study of spiral galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) reveals a significant asymmetry in their distribution, suggesting a potential handedness in the universe. This asymmetry aligns with the "axis of Evil," a controversial correlation with the quadrupole and octopole moments from the WMAP microwave sky survey. Additionally, research on cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy examines point-parity and mirror-parity handedness, indicating that while point parity shows minimal confidence, mirror parity may define a preferred axis in the universe. The findings could provide insights into the unexpected signals observed in cosmic data. Overall, the evidence points toward a complex structure in the universe that challenges conventional understanding.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0703325

Authors: Michael J. Longo
Comments: 7 pages, 3 figures. Link to supporting material has been corrected. [ this http URL ]

In this article I study the distribution of spiral galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to investigate whether the universe has an overall handedness. A preference for spiral galaxies in one sector of the sky to be left-handed or right-handed spirals would indicate an asymmetry in the overall universe and a preferred axis. The SDSS data show a strong signal for such an asymmetry. Its axis seems to be strongly correlated with that of the quadrupole and octopole moments in the WMAP microwave sky survey, an unlikely alignment that has been dubbed "the axis of Evil".
 
Space news on Phys.org
http://www.citebase.org/abstract?id=oai:arXiv.org:astro-ph/0507289

Authors: Land, Kate; Magueijo, Joao
We investigate the point-parity and mirror-parity handedness of the large angle anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). In particular we consider whether the observed low CMB quadrupole could more generally signal odd point-parity, i.e. suppression of even multipoles. Even though this feature is ``visually'' present in most renditions of the WMAP dataset we find that it never supports parity preference beyond the meagre 95% confidence level. This is fortunate as point parity handedness implies almost certainly a high level of galactic contamination. Mirror reflection parity, on the contrary, is related to the emergence of a preferred axis, defining the symmetry plane. We use this technique to make contact with recent claims for an anisotropic Universe, showing that the detected preferred axis is associated with positive (even) mirror parity. This feature may be an important clue in identifying the culprit for this unexpected signal.
Comment: Submitted to Physical Review D

Phys.Rev. D72 (2005) 101302
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top