Is This a Valid Topology on [0, ∞)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blahblah8724
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Topology
blahblah8724
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I am told that the interval (a, ∞) where a \in (0, ∞) together the empty set and [0, ∞) form a topology on [0, ∞).

But I thought in a topology that the intersection if any two sets had to also be in the topology, but the intersection of say (a, ∞) with (b, ∞) where a<b is surely (a,b) which isn't in the topology?

Help! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given any nonepty set X, the collection (empty set, X) is a topology. It is called "trivial topology". Please, check that it indeed satisfies all the axioms of a topological space.
 
blahblah8724 said:
I am told that the interval (a, ∞) where a \in (0, ∞) together the empty set and [0, ∞) form a topology on [0, ∞).

But I thought in a topology that the intersection if any two sets had to also be in the topology, but the intersection of say (a, ∞) with (b, ∞) where a<b is surely (a,b) which isn't in the topology?

Help! Thanks!

the intersection of (a,∞) and (b,∞) where a<b is (b,∞), not (a,b).
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.

Similar threads

Back
Top