Does Time Exist? My Reasoning Explored

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eng_09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the philosophical and scientific inquiry into the existence of time, positing that time is merely a measurement of energy state changes rather than a fundamental entity. The author references the twin paradox, suggesting that time dilation occurs due to variations in atomic changes at relativistic speeds, which are influenced by energy states as described by the equation E=mc². The conclusion drawn is that our perception of time may be an illusion based on consistent energy changes rather than an independent dimension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the twin paradox in relativity
  • Familiarity with the equation E=mc²
  • Basic knowledge of atomic physics and energy states
  • Concept of time dilation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the twin paradox on time perception
  • Explore the relationship between energy states and time in quantum mechanics
  • Study the philosophical implications of time as a construct
  • Investigate alternative theories of time in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, physicists, and anyone interested in the nature of time and its implications in both scientific and existential contexts.

eng_09
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does time exist? I'm am not so sure it does.

my reasoning is;
1. time is a measurement of frequency of change of energy state.
2. controlled energy changes are constant, and don't vary, so if time existed we would see variations.

now I know that the twin paradox is the go-to for proving that time exists.
In the twin paradox, the traveler is moving close to c.
since e=mc^2, e must remain static.
I believe that to compensate for a static e value for each atom at immense speed, the atomic changes slow. So, atom change varies with the energy from speed, causing a slowed aging process at high speeds and a faster aging process at lower speeds.

So, basically i think that we have fooled ourselves into believing time. When all we are measuring is recognized energy changes, and it also allows for a measurement of our current energy state, especially since we are all on the same space rock, moving at the same speed.

I know I sound like sound like a mad scientist, and I am probably wrong about a lot of things, I would just like to know whether this makes sense or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no.

If you want to see many discussions on this subject, just do a search.

PS: you'll have to define what you mean by 'exist' and 'makes sense'...
 
Thread closed for Moderation...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
708
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K