Does Walking Uphill Burn More Calories Than a Flat Walk?

• robert Ihnot
In summary, there are various factors that can affect the number of calories burned during a walk or run, such as the terrain and elevation changes. While it is generally believed that walking or running a mile burns 100 calories, a 2.5 mile walk with a 15 degree climb and descent may actually burn more calories than a straight 5 mile walk. This is because climbing hills and then coming back down requires more energy. Additionally, different individuals may have different energy needs and burn more or less calories depending on their body mechanics and metabolism. To accurately determine the number of calories burned, practical physics can be used to calculate the work done by the person, but a more complex mathematical model would be needed to determine the energy burned by the
robert Ihnot
It is generally thought for every mile you walk or run, you burn 100 calories. Supose one were to walk uptown at a 15 degree climb for 2.5 miles and then walk back down 2.5 miles to the original start. It would seem this is harder than just burning 500 calories on a straight 5 mile walk.

Newton's first law of motion seems to say, that nothing is achieve walking on level ground, but for the person it is exertion. I don't know what could be said about climbing hills and then coming back down to the original spot.

Is there a practical Physics of sorts that has anything to say about this? Or is the only answer an attempt to discover the calories burned on the trip?

robert Ihnot said:
It is generally thought for every mile you walk or run, you burn 100 calories. Supose one were to walk uptown at a 15 degree climb for 2.5 miles and then walk back down 2.5 miles to the original start. It would seem this is harder than just burning 500 calories on a straight 5 mile walk.

Instead of using theory, think in tems of what you know about hotwheels. You have 2 tracks:
-a track that is 10 feet long, straight, and has an overall drop of 1 inch
-a track that is 10 feet long, goes up and down, has an overall drop of 1 inch

Which track would have the car going the fastest by the end? (which track is easier?)

Maybe you've never done this before, but I have. I can tell you that the little car won't even make it to the end of the hilly track. Pretty much anything with hills in it requires a lot more energy. Going uphill then downhill would probably burn a lot more calories than just going straight.

Last edited:
Some experimental info : I took a look at last couple of exercies in heart rate monitor, slow pace (say 5 min/km) approx. 100 kcal/mile, fast pace (say 3 min/km) approx. 125 kcal/mile ... the "fast" pace is a bit difficult to estimate, would say it's between 120 - 160 kcal / mile. Typically I for one consume around 20-40% more energy in hilly terrain than on level if I keep the speed fixed (of course this only applies to "moderate" terrain, put enough slope and the exertion chart goes through the roof). You could approach it practically by way they do in HR monitors, then you'd just have to guess / test yourself what sort of HRs you'd exhibit as a function of slope angle etc.

The body is not a simple machine therefore work/energy calculations are a function of each individuals body mechanics and metabolism. I remember my cross country coach telling us it takes more energy to go down hill due to the braking work done in our legs. This may or may not be true but it gave us a perspective that there is no free ride. If I were to race micheal phelps I would put out a lot more energy but come in far behind him.
There must be some resource out there to get some data on calorie burning for humans walking, running etc. It would be interesting to see how elevation change effects calorie burning. For instance, would you burn more calories if you climbed a vertical ladder 100m then ran a horizontal mile or if you ran a mile up a steady slope with a 100 m vertical change? When Robert said practical physics i'll take that to mean simple or algebra based physics. We can use practical physics to determine the work done by the system (person) but determining the energy burned by the person would require modeling the human body with non-practical math.

1. How does the number of calories consumed per mile vary based on activity?

The number of calories consumed per mile can vary greatly depending on the type and intensity of the activity. For example, walking at a moderate pace may burn around 100 calories per mile, while running can burn up to 200 calories per mile.

2. Is 100 calories per mile an accurate estimate for all individuals?

No, the number of calories consumed per mile can vary depending on an individual's weight, muscle mass, and metabolism. This estimate is based on an average adult weighing around 150 pounds.

3. What factors can affect the number of calories burned per mile?

Aside from the type and intensity of the activity, factors such as age, gender, and overall fitness level can also impact the number of calories burned per mile. In addition, environmental factors like terrain and weather can also play a role.

4. How does 100 calories per mile contribute to weight loss?

In order to lose one pound of body fat, a deficit of 3500 calories is needed. By burning 100 calories per mile, an individual could potentially lose one pound after walking or running 35 miles. However, weight loss is also impacted by diet and other lifestyle factors.

5. Can I use the number of calories consumed per mile to track my fitness progress?

Yes, tracking the number of calories burned per mile can be a useful tool for monitoring your overall fitness progress. However, it should not be the sole measure of your fitness level and should be used in conjunction with other factors such as heart rate, endurance, and strength.

• Other Physics Topics
Replies
21
Views
24K
• Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
3K
• Mechanics
Replies
10
Views
2K
• DIY Projects
Replies
21
Views
4K
• Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
• Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
3K
• Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
1
Views
3K
• General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
• Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
2
Views
2K