MHB Does y = sqrt{anything} Qualify as a One-to-One Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the function y = sqrt{anything} qualifies as a one-to-one function, highlighting that it depends on the specific expression under the square root. The function f(x) = sqrt{x} is identified as one-to-one, while g(x) = sqrt{sin(x) + 1} is not, due to the periodic nature of the sine function affecting its output. The participants suggest plotting the graphs of both functions to visually compare their behaviors. Both functions pass the vertical line test, confirming they are functions, but their one-to-one status differs based on their definitions. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for determining the characteristics of such functions.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Why must we restrict y = sqrt{anything}?

Is y = sqrt{anything} one-to-one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It depends on the "anything"...for example:

$$f(x)=\sqrt{x}$$

is one-to-one, while:

$$g(x)=\sqrt{\sin(x)+1}$$

is not one-to-one.
 
Can you explain the difference between f(x) and g(x)?
 
RTCNTC said:
Can you explain the difference between f(x) and g(x)?

Let's plot their graphs to see how they differ. :D

[DESMOS=-0.3404183173408105,19.659581682659205,-0.3390203078626133,6.59940120124406]y=\sqrt{x};y=\sqrt{1+\sin\left(x\right)}[/DESMOS]
 
I see they both pass the vertical line test.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top