Donor and recipient energy bands in doped semiconductor

AI Thread Summary
Electrons in the donor and acceptor energy bands of doped semiconductors can contribute to electrical conduction, as they reside between the conduction and valence bands and require less energy to ionize. While the conduction band and valence band are typically recognized for their roles in conductivity, the involvement of donor and acceptor levels is often overlooked in calculations, leading to assumptions that they do not contribute. Some models do consider these energy levels, indicating that their inclusion can affect free carrier counts. Simplifying assumptions in certain textbooks may exclude these bands, assuming they are fully ionized or balanced. Understanding the role of donor and acceptor bands is crucial for a comprehensive view of semiconductor conductivity.
Godwin Kessy
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Are the electrons in the donor and recipient energy bands in doped material involved in conduction of electricity, and why?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Godwin Kessy said:
Are the electrons in the donor and recipient energy bands in doped material involved in conduction of electricity, and why?

Sounds like a schoolwork question. Please tell us what you know so far about electrons in the conduction band...
 
No it's not a class question. I just found my self asking this question and not really getting a compromise. Look here it's clear that not only the conduction band but also the valence band is involved in electric conductivity as it the usual current in conduction band and the hole current in valence band. Now what about the electrons residing in the donor and the recipient bands residing in the doped semiconductors? got it?
 
I am assuming you mean the donor and acceptor levels.

You mention it's clear that not only the conduction but also valence band is involved in electric conductivity. So why is it not also clear that the donor and acceptor levels are involved as they reside between the conduction and valence band? It takes even less energy to ionize from (or to) them, which is their point.

Unless a donor and acceptor band is something else entirely... In which case I'll need you to define it for me.
 
@Esi... It's not clear as we all see that they are not included in the calculations. They are actually assumed not to be involved... For the reason am looking for.. Got it?
 
Maybe this will help.

band3.gif


http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/solids/band.html
 
Godwin Kessy said:
It's not clear as we all see that they are not included in the calculations.

Which calculations? The free carrier count?
Some models do include them. See this link for example:
http://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter2/ch2_6.htm#2_6_4

If your book does not include them then they likely made some simplifying assumptions. Things like the level is small, fully ionized, donor and acceptors are balanced. Or more simply, the levels all contain no carriers and therefore do not contribute to the count.
 
Back
Top