Doped Graphite May Be Superconductive Upto 230 C

  • Thread starter Thread starter sanman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphite
sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
Doped graphite has shown tantalizing hints of superconductivity at temperatures upto 230 Celsius:

http://www.nature.com/news/tantalizing-hints-of-room-temperature-superconductivity-1.11443

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/429203/room-temperature-superconductivity-found-in/

Heh - Graphite and Water - sounds like Steampunk :bugeye:

We could have had this 250 years ago, dammit - just think where we'd be now...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not really a proof of room temperature superconductivity (RTS); it only shows "signs" of RTS. Further investigations are required to verify this claim. In the past, there have been many claims of room temperature superconductivity, which fell apart upon further investigation. In order to call something a superconductor it must demonstrate ALL of the following phenomenology:

(1) Zero resistance (in the dc limit)
(2) Meissner effect
(3) Persistent currents & fluxoid quantization
(4) Existence of magnetic critical fields
(5) Macroscopic phase coherence and quantum interference (due to Josephson pair tunneling effect)
(6) Gapped excitations

If even one of the above is not observed then it is not a superconductor. In the above study only the plots of magnetization versus temperature look "similar" to the ones obtained for cuprate high-temperature superconductors observed in the 1980s.

As the theorist Alexander Gurevich points out, this magnetic response could simply be the result of certain impurities. One can, however, make an argument at the other extreme: maybe if they improved the quality of the samples one may observe all of the above six effects. But that is just wishful thinking; but a possibility which cannot be ignored nevertheless.

To sum it all up, one can say that we have "signs" that could lead to a potential breakthrough. But at this moment we cannot say that we have "found it."
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Back
Top