Doppler Effect & Beat Frequency

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Doppler Effect in calculating the beat frequency experienced by a horseshoe bat flying towards a wall at 15 m/s while emitting a sound at 35 kHz. The initial calculation yielded a frequency of -38.20 kHz for the echo, leading to a beat frequency of 73.2 kHz. However, a more accurate approach involves using absolute values to determine the beat frequency, resulting in a more reasonable estimate of approximately 3 kHz. The importance of treating frequency as a scalar quantity rather than a vector is emphasized for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Doppler Effect and its formula
  • Knowledge of beat frequency and its calculation
  • Familiarity with sound wave properties and frequency measurement
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Doppler Effect in various mediums, including air and water
  • Learn about sound wave properties and their impact on frequency perception
  • Explore beat frequency calculations in different scenarios, such as musical instruments
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on sound speed and frequency
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, acoustics researchers, and anyone interested in sound wave behavior and frequency analysis.

dcramps
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Horseshoe bats use the Doppler Effect to determine their
location. A horseshoe bat flies toward a wall at a speed of 15 m/s while emitting a sound of
frequency 35 kHz. What is the beat frequency between the emission frequency and the
echo? Assume that the air temperature is 20C.

Homework Equations


Doppler effect
f0=[(1-v0/v)/(1-vs/v)]fs
Beat Frequency
fbeat = Δf

The Attempt at a Solution



f0=[(1-(-343m/s)/(15m/s))/(1-(343m/s)/(15m/s))]*35kHz
f0=-38.20121951kHz

fbeat = Δf = fs-f0
fbeat = 35kHz-(-38.20121951kHz)
fbeat = 73.2kHz

I'm not sure that I have solved this correctly. It seems strange to me that the echo has more than double the frequency of the original sound. edit; or should I say, that the beat frequency is more than double that of the original sound.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, I assumed v0 was negative because the sound is traveling in the opposite direction of the source at that point. Is this correct?
 
Well, the answering 'tutor's' fomulas may be approximately OK, especially if lifted from some random handbook, but his understanding of beat frequency is rubbish.

Instead mechanically using the signs that come out of these arbitrary formulas, you should find the difference between absoulte values (modulus), ie compare both frequencies without the minus sign. When you do this you will have computed approx 3kHz, which could be a more reasonable answer.

Frequency here is a scalar, not a vector. You complare them just like you compare the lengths of two sticks: you subtract from the longer one the length of the shorter, no matter in which direction the sticks may be pointing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K