Proving Double Factorial: (2n)!=2^nn!

  • Thread starter Thread starter matematikuvol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equation (2n)! = 2^n n! using various methods. Participants suggest proving it by induction, starting with the base case of n=1 and assuming it holds for n, then demonstrating it for n+1. However, an alternative approach is proposed, emphasizing a direct computation based on the definition of double factorial. The breakdown of each term in the double factorial shows that combining the factors of two leads to a clear understanding of the remaining components. The conversation highlights the effectiveness of both induction and direct computation in establishing the proof.
matematikuvol
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
How to prove

(2n)!=2^nn!

for example

(2)!=2^11!=2

(4)!=2^22!=8

...

(2n)!=2n(2n-2)(2n-4)...=2^3n(n-1)(n-2)...

I see that by intiution but I don't know how to write prove.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Prove it by induction. You've shown that it holds for the case n =1, so if you assume that it holds for general n, show that it follows that it holds for the case n+1.
 
You don't need induction. A direct computation using the definition of the double factorial is enough.
 
How?
 
<br /> (2 n)! = 2 \times 4 \times \ldots \times (2 n)<br />

But, notice that:
<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> 2 = 2 \times 1 \\<br /> <br /> 4 = 2 \times 2 \\<br /> <br /> \ldots \\<br /> <br /> 2 n = 2 \times n<br /> \end{array}<br />

Combine the first factor of two from each factor in the double factoriel. How many of them are there? What do the remaining factors give?
 
Tnx :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top