Double-grounded circuit, find I across one of two resistors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The current through the 2-ohm resistor in the circuit is 3A, calculated using Kirchhoff's loop law. Grounding both terminals of the load results in no potential difference across the 4-ohm resistor, effectively making it irrelevant to the current calculation. The equation used was 9V - (2 ohms)*I - 3V = 0, leading to the conclusion that I = 3A. This confirms that grounding does not affect the circuit's behavior in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's loop law
  • Basic knowledge of electrical circuits and resistors
  • Familiarity with voltage, current, and resistance relationships
  • Concept of grounding in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced applications of Kirchhoff's laws in complex circuits
  • Learn about the implications of grounding in circuit design
  • Explore the effects of parallel and series resistor configurations
  • Investigate safety protocols for connecting batteries in parallel
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in circuit analysis and troubleshooting.

kamhogo
Messages
86
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


What is the current in the 2 ohms resistor?
tmp_21127-20160403_000946-639066610.jpg


Homework Equations


Kirchhoff's loop law

The Attempt at a Solution


Grounding does not affect how the circuit behaves, so I ignored the ground in and applied the loop law (clockwise from the negative terminal of the 9V battery ):

ΔV(loop) = 9V -(2 ohms)*I - 3V - (4 ohms)*I =0
6V = (6 ohms)*I
I = 1 A

Correct?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin
Physics news on Phys.org
kamhogo said:
Grounding does not affect how the circuit behaves, so I ignored the ground in and applied the loop law

well i do not work with circuits much- but if you have grounded both terminals of a load -can you expect a current to flow in the lower 4 ohms resistance.
grounding a circuit defines the potential to be zero (definitely)
further i failed to understand -what you wish to convey through this expt.?
 
Incorrect. The system is grounded at two different points, indicating that those points must have the same potential.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
^^...So you have the same simplification as in the last problem. After which...? :oldsmile:
 
So I can ignore the 4 ohms resistor in my calculations? Then the current through the 2 ohms resistor would be given by:

9V - (2 ohms)*I - 3V =0
6V / 2 ohms = I = 3A
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
drvrm said:
well i do not work with circuits much- but if you have grounded both terminals of a load -can you expect a current to flow in the lower 4 ohms resistance.
grounding a circuit defines the potential to be zero (definitely)
further i failed to understand -what you wish to convey through this expt.?
From what I understand now, the 4 ohms resistor might as well not be there...it's between 2 points of zero potential and so no current flows through it. Right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
kamhogo said:
From what I understand now, the 4 ohms resistor might as well not be there...it's between 2 points of zero potential and so no current flows through it. Right?
Right. You need a potential difference between its ends to provide a current.

In this respect, grounding the two points is like short-circuiting them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kamhogo
When connecting in Parallel you are doubling the capacity (amp hours) of the battery while maintaining the voltage of one of the individual batteries. Use a jumper wire between the positives of both batteries and another jumper wire between the negatives of both batteries. Connect your positive and negative wires to the same battery to run to your application.
 
drvrm said:
When connecting in Parallel you are doubling the capacity (amp hours) of the battery while maintaining the voltage of one of the individual batteries. Use a jumper wire between the positives of both batteries and another jumper wire between the negatives of both batteries. Connect your positive and negative wires to the same battery to run to your application.
This does not add any insight to the current problem at hand. Please stay on topic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
  • #10
kamhogo said:
So I can ignore the 4 ohms resistor in my calculations? Then the current through the 2 ohms resistor would be given by:

9V - (2 ohms)*I - 3V =0
6V / 2 ohms = I = 3A

This is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kamhogo
  • #11
drvrm said:
When connecting in Parallel you are doubling the capacity (amp hours) of the battery while maintaining the voltage of one of the individual batteries. Use a jumper wire between the positives of both batteries and another jumper wire between the negatives of both batteries. Connect your positive and negative wires to the same battery to run to your application.
This is confusing...what's a jumper wire? Why connect the terminals?
 
  • #12
kamhogo said:
This is confusing...what's a jumper wire? Why connect the terminals?
Ignore the reply of @drvrm !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and CWatters
  • #13
drvrm said:
When connecting in Parallel you are doubling the capacity (amp hours) of the battery while maintaining the voltage of one of the individual batteries. Use a jumper wire between the positives of both batteries and another jumper wire between the negatives of both batteries. Connect your positive and negative wires to the same battery to run to your application.

This is not relevant to this thread.

In addition it is wrong and potentially dangerous. In this thread the batteries are different voltages and batteries with different voltages should never be connected in parallel.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and SammyS
  • #14
tmp_31440-20160403_224159-639066610.jpg
I'm getting better at this circuit analysis thing!
 
  • #15
kamhogo said:
View attachment 98526 I'm getting better at this circuit analysis thing!
upload_2016-4-4_12-23-45.png


upload_2016-4-4_12-24-59.png

etc.That seems correct.

The image is hard to read. I had to zoom way in.

In the future it's best to start a new tread for a new problem.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-4-4_12-24-47.png
    upload_2016-4-4_12-24-47.png
    22.4 KB · Views: 558
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kamhogo
  • #16
SammyS said:
View attachment 98530

View attachment 98532
etc.That seems correct.

The image is hard to read. I had to zoom way in.

In the future it's best to start a new tread for a new problem.

And to use an app like DocScanHD to make the images more visible and less unpleasant to look at.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K