Double pulley problem-difference in acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double pulley problem involving differences in acceleration between two scenarios. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the mechanics of pulleys, particularly in relation to the forces at play and how they affect acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between tension in the rope and the weights involved, questioning whether the tension is the same in both scenarios. They also discuss the implications of different masses and forces on acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on applying Newton's 2nd law to analyze the forces involved. There is ongoing exploration of the differences in tension and acceleration between the two cases, with some participants still seeking clarity on these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem setup may involve assumptions about mass and force that are not explicitly stated, leading to confusion in understanding the differences between the two cases.

Arait
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Double pulley problem--difference in acceleration

Homework Statement



http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/8793/picture1jv.png

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Homework Equations



a= g(M-m)/M+m

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so overall, pulleys just confuse me. We barely mentioned them in class and there's precious little about them in our books. I tried to answer this question and was able to get the first part (a) by finding the above equation on Google. However, as the question would lead you to assume, the answer to be is NOT the same. The problem is, I see no difference other than the fact that a box was replaced by hand. I don't understand why, if the downward force is the same, you would get a different acceleration. Because I don't understand this, it's making it pretty much impossible to know what to change in order to solve part b. I don't even know where to get started...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Arait said:
a= g(M-m)/M+m
You should learn how this formula was derived using Newton's 2nd law.

To see the difference between the two situations, compare the tension in the rope. Are they the same? Is the tension in version a equal to the weight of the second mass?
 


I'm still lost. The mass of the hand is probably different from the mass of the block, but as long as the force is the same, I don't see how it would change anything.
 


I found something in my book that says that a the force T applied at one end of amassless rope is transmitted undiminished to the other end. Does this mean that T=958 N on both sides?
 


Arait said:
I'm still lost. The mass of the hand is probably different from the mass of the block, but as long as the force is the same, I don't see how it would change anything.
True, if the force were the same then there would be no difference in the two scenarios. But is the force the same?

Answer my question: Is the tension in version a equal to the weight of the second mass?
 


Arait said:
I found something in my book that says that a the force T applied at one end of amassless rope is transmitted undiminished to the other end.
Yes, for a massless rope the tension is the same throughout.
Does this mean that T=958 N on both sides?
What makes you think that that's the tension?
 


Doc Al said:
Yes, for a massless rope the tension is the same throughout.

What makes you think that that's the tension?

I don't know. It's the opposite of gravity? I know that doesn't work since there's acceleration other than gravity acting in the downward direction, but I don't know how to solve for tension when there are so many variables you don't know.
 


Doc Al said:
True, if the force were the same then there would be no difference in the two scenarios. But is the force the same?

Answer my question: Is the tension in version a equal to the weight of the second mass?

I'm betting it's not... But I don't know how to calculate it.
 


Arait said:
I don't know. It's the opposite of gravity? I know that doesn't work since there's acceleration other than gravity acting in the downward direction, but I don't know how to solve for tension when there are so many variables you don't know.
You can solve for the tension and the acceleration--which are the only two unknowns in case a--by applying Newton's 2nd law to each mass. Start by identifying the forces on each.

(In case b you are given the tension, so it should be easier to calculate the acceleration.)
 
  • #10


I got it right by taking 958-(small mass)(g)=(small mass)(a). I got a=12.99 m/s^2. So, my homework is now done, but even though I figured out the right number, I'm still conceptually having a problem seeing the difference between Case A and Case B.
 
  • #11


Arait said:
I got it right by taking 958-(small mass)(g)=(small mass)(a). I got a=12.99 m/s^2.
That's not quite correct. Is it reasonable that the acceleration of the masses would be greater that something in free fall?

Show how you arrived at this result.
So, my homework is now done, but even though I figured out the right number, I'm still conceptually having a problem seeing the difference between Case A and Case B.
You'll need to redo your solution for case a. Then you can compare the tension in each case. (What's the tension in case b?)
 
  • #12


I think I kinda see it now. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K