Double Slit Experiment: Q&A on Photon Detection

mitarbre
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a simple question about the double slit experiment for which I couldn't find an answer elsewhere.

Lets say that I shoot one million photons from the source while keeping only the first slit open and that I detect N1 photons on the screen behind the slits. If I now shoot one million photons while keeping only the second slit open I detect N2 photons (N1 and N2 should be pretty close). If I now open both slits and I shoot one million photons how many photons should I detect? N1+N2 or considerably less?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone? Is my question stupid or no one knows the answer?
 
It should be n1 + n2. Why do you think it should be less.
 
I wanted to confirm what I thought and if such is the case than it looks to me that the interference pattern is a property of space between slits and the detector and not a property of the particle. In other words, making slits alters the space in such a way that the detected position of the particle is biased. Somewhat like a wavy bowling lane. Does it make any sense?
 
No, in both cases you detect N1+N2, but that is if you have one HUGE detector that will grab anything past the slits, or alternatively a large number of detectors that cover all space past the slits. The interference pattern has to do with the distribution of photons caught by each such detector, depending on its position, not the total number of photons caught by all detectors
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...

Similar threads

Back
Top