Double Slit Experiment: Q&A on Photon Detection

mitarbre
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a simple question about the double slit experiment for which I couldn't find an answer elsewhere.

Lets say that I shoot one million photons from the source while keeping only the first slit open and that I detect N1 photons on the screen behind the slits. If I now shoot one million photons while keeping only the second slit open I detect N2 photons (N1 and N2 should be pretty close). If I now open both slits and I shoot one million photons how many photons should I detect? N1+N2 or considerably less?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone? Is my question stupid or no one knows the answer?
 
It should be n1 + n2. Why do you think it should be less.
 
I wanted to confirm what I thought and if such is the case than it looks to me that the interference pattern is a property of space between slits and the detector and not a property of the particle. In other words, making slits alters the space in such a way that the detected position of the particle is biased. Somewhat like a wavy bowling lane. Does it make any sense?
 
No, in both cases you detect N1+N2, but that is if you have one HUGE detector that will grab anything past the slits, or alternatively a large number of detectors that cover all space past the slits. The interference pattern has to do with the distribution of photons caught by each such detector, depending on its position, not the total number of photons caught by all detectors
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top