Double slit experiment with a slit covered.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double-slit experiment where one slit is covered with a thin flake of mica, and participants are tasked with determining the thickness of the mica given that the central point on the screen corresponds to the 7th bright fringe. The subject area includes optics and wave interference, particularly focusing on path differences and wavelength changes in different media.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the path difference caused by the mica and the wavelength of light, with some attempting to derive equations based on Snell's law and the properties of light in different media. Questions arise regarding the treatment of refraction and the implications of the problem's wording on the expected outcomes.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of attempts to clarify the problem and explore different interpretations. Some participants suggest that refraction may not need to be considered, while others express uncertainty about the implications of the mica's effect on the interference pattern. A participant claims to have solved the problem, indicating that some guidance or insights may have emerged during the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of an angle of incidence for the light, which complicates the application of Snell's law. There is also mention of the need to consider the effective wavelength in mica compared to air, which may influence the calculations.

Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


A thin flake of mica (n=1.58) is used to cover one slit of a double-slit arrangement.The central point on the screen is occupied by the 7th brigth fringe.If lamda = 550nm, what is the thickness of the mica?

Homework Equations


path difference d=(n-1)*thickness
d=7*lamda
snell's law?

The Attempt at a Solution


first, the paths above the glass must be the same.So they are not in consideration.
let l be the thickness of the glass,t be the length traveled by light in mica,x in air
The mica:
sinθ=nsin
sin∅=sinθ/n...(1)
sin∅=l/t..(2)

(1)/(2),
sinθ=nl/t...(3)

In the air:
sinθ=l/x...(4)
compare 4 and 3,
i came out, t=xn.

Then i started to consider the difference of wavelength,
because the wavelength in mica is shorter than in air.
I tried to subtract the sum of the pulses in air and mica and set it equals to 7 lamda,
but what came out is peculiar,
let m , n be the number of pulses in mica and air respectively,f=frequency
m=tf/v...(5)
n=xf/c..(6)
so...
m/n=nt/x
i suppose it being m/n = t/nx ...so that they can be canceled out...
Please help for this:((
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clara Chung said:

Homework Statement


A thin flake of mica (n=1.58) is used to cover one slit of a double-slit arrangement.The central point on the screen is occupied by the 7th brigth fringe.If lamda = 550nm, what is the thickness of the mica?

Homework Equations


path difference d=(n-1)*thickness
d=7*lamda
snell's law?

The Attempt at a Solution


first, the paths above the glass must be the same.So they are not in consideration.
let l be the thickness of the glass,t be the length traveled by light in mica,x in air
The mica:
sinθ=nsin
sin∅=sinθ/n...(1)
sin∅=l/t..(2)

(1)/(2),
sinθ=nl/t...(3)

In the air:
sinθ=l/x...(4)
compare 4 and 3,
i came out, t=xn.

Then i started to consider the difference of wavelength,
because the wavelength in mica is shorter than in air.
I tried to subtract the sum of the pulses in air and mica and set it equals to 7 lamda,
but what came out is peculiar,
let m , n be the number of pulses in mica and air respectively,f=frequency
m=tf/v...(5)
n=xf/c..(6)
so...
m/n=nt/x
i suppose it being m/n = t/nx ...so that they can be canceled out...
Please help for this:((
I have the feeling that they do not expect you to take into consideration refraction through the mica (how could you, you do not have an angle of incidence). I think you can safely neglect that and just consider an incident angle of zero in which case what you wrote in part 2 is all you need.
 
I don't quite like the way that this question is worded.
I think that it means that what was the 7th bright fringe becomes shifted into the central bright maximum.
Overall, I don't think that the appearance of the screen pattern would change.
Then the problem becomes to calculate the thickness of the mica in order for the
mica to contain 7 more wavelengths than would be contained in an equivalent thickness of air.
This should not be too difficult since you know that the wavelength in the mica = 5.5 * 10E-7 / 1.58.
as compared to 5.5 * 10E-7 in air.
 
thank you all :)) i have solved the problem :D
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K