Double Slit Interference (nonzero slit width)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance between adjacent bright fringes in a double slit interference experiment with slits of 0.1mm width and a separation of 3.0mm, illuminated by light of 589nm wavelength. The screen is positioned 5.0m away from the slits. Key equations include β = 2πsin(θ)/λ and φ = 2πasin(θ)/λ, with the relationship between the electric field intensity and these parameters being crucial for determining fringe positions. The participants clarify the roles of φ and β, emphasizing that measurements near the central axis allow simplifications in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double slit interference principles
  • Familiarity with wave optics equations, specifically β and φ
  • Knowledge of electric field intensity in wave interference
  • Basic trigonometry and calculus for differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the double slit interference pattern using the wave equation
  • Learn about the impact of slit width on diffraction patterns
  • Explore the concept of fringe spacing in interference experiments
  • Investigate the approximation methods for sin(β/2) near the central axis
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on wave optics and interference phenomena, as well as researchers analyzing experimental setups involving light diffraction.

TOD
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mask with 2 slits is illuminated by a light of 589nm wavelength. Slits each have a 0.1mm width separated (centre to centre) by 3.0mm. Calculate the distance between adjacent bright fringes on the screen if a screen is placed 5.0m away from the slits.


Homework Equations


Where

\beta=2\pidsin\theta/\lambda

\phi=2\piasin\theta/\lambda

d=slit separation
a=slit width

E=E(max)cos\frac{\phi}{2}*(\frac{sin(\beta/2)}{\beta/2})

(sorry, no good with this latex stuff, some stuff not showing right)

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I assume that if given a slit width of some size then we cannot assume that the interference comes from points sources. So to calculate the distance between adjacent bright fringes, I took on the formula for intensity and turned it into electric field of some form (just square rooted) and tried to differentiate the electric field and then find the roots of the equation. However I have found this extremely lengthy and most probably unnecessary. Can anyone get me started in the correct direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Treat the problem as the superposition of two diffraction patterns, one from each 0.1 mm slit. Where a bright fringe from one source occupies the same position as the other source's bright fringe this is a bright fringe of the double slit system.
 
TOD said:

Homework Equations


Where

\beta=2\pidsin\theta/\lambda

\phi=2\piasin\theta/\lambda
Looks like you have φ and β switched around here, given your expression for E below.

d=slit separation
a=slit width

E=E(max)cos\frac{\phi}{2}*(\frac{sin(\beta/2)}{\beta/2})

Okay. And what must
cos(φ/2) = cos[π d sin(θ) / λ ]

be equal to, for a bright intensity fringe to occur?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Looks like you have φ and β switched around here, given your expression for E below.

Ah yes, my bad.


Okay. And what must
cos(φ/2) = cos[π d sin(θ) / λ ]

be equal to, for a bright intensity fringe to occur?

Plus or minus one? So I could in theory get that thing to equal 1, but that doesn't mean the product of this and the sine of a sine function is maximum does it?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Okay. And what must
cos(φ/2) = cos[π d sin(θ) / λ ]

be equal to, for a bright intensity fringe to occur?


TOD said:
Plus or minus one?
Yes, exactly.

TOD said:
So I could in theory get that thing to equal 1, but that doesn't mean the product of this and the sine of a sine function is maximum does it?
That's a good question. The answer, in practice, is yes it does. Since measurements of fringe spacing are typically done near the central axis, where
sin(β/2) / (β/2) ≈ 1,​
the effect of the sin(β/2) term can be ignored.

Or put another way, the cos(φ/2) term oscillates many many times for each oscillation of the sin(β/2) term. This is because d and φ are much larger than a and β, respectively. (In the present case they are 30 times larger.)

Hope that helps.
 
Redbelly98 said:
Yes, exactly.


That's a good question. The answer, in practice, is yes it does. Since measurements of fringe spacing are typically done near the central axis, where
sin(β/2) / (β/2) ≈ 1,​
the effect of the sin(β/2) term can be ignored.

Or put another way, the cos(φ/2) term oscillates many many times for each oscillation of the sin(β/2) term. This is because d and φ are much larger than a and β, respectively. (In the present case they are 30 times larger.)

Hope that helps.

Very interesting. Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K