Double Slit Interference Question II

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a double-slit experiment involving photons that are split into entangled pairs using a crystal. The configuration depicted in Figure 2 eliminates the Coincidence Counter and half-silvered mirrors, directing all photons to detectors D1 and D3. Participants debate whether this setup will disrupt interference patterns observed at detector D0. The consensus is that the removal of the Coincidence Counter is valid, as it does not affect the detection of photons that may or may not have which-path information.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum entanglement and photon behavior
  • Familiarity with double-slit experiments in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of detection methods in quantum optics
  • Basic principles of interference patterns in wave phenomena
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Quantum Eraser experiments" for deeper insights into interference and entanglement
  • Study "Photon detection techniques" to understand various methods of observing quantum states
  • Explore "Quantum mechanics and wave-particle duality" to grasp foundational concepts
  • Investigate "Delayed choice experiments" to comprehend the implications of measurement timing on quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the intricacies of photon behavior and interference patterns in quantum experiments.

David Charles
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Follow-up to my previous post (Double Slit Interference Question) I have a question regarding the effect(s) of obtaining the which-path information of photons that have travelled through a double slit. I'm posting the question anew without my previous diagram which was incomplete/confusing. The basic question is: if detectors are positioned such that every single photon striking a detector must have come from one or another of the two slits, will this automatically destroy all interference?
A stream of photons pass through a double-slit. The photon stream emerging from each slit then passes through a crystal which splits each photon into coherent entangled pairs. One photon from each pair heads towards a detector (D0) that "can be scanned by a step motor along its x-axis for the observation of interference fringes" and the entangled twin travels toward one of two detectors (one for each slit)

Figure 1 is a replica of a figure from "A DELAYED CHOICE QUANTUM ERASER" - https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9903047v1. Since many of you are more familiar with this experiment than myself, I won’t explain anything here.

Figure 2 shows a simplified version of the configuration in Figure 1. In Figure 2, the Coincidence Counter has been removed, as well as the half-silvered mirrors. Mirror 3 has been repositioned such that it directs all photons to a detector. All photons will thus be detected at either D1 or D3.

Question: Will the experiment shown in Figure 2 work? (i.e. will the detection of photons at D1 and D3 destroy any interference that may have occurred at D0?)

I'm thinking that in the Figure 2 configuration, the Coincidence Counter is not necessary, as we are not trying to extract a subset of photons from a superset consisting of a mix of photons that had either the which-path information obtained or not.

Thanks, so much.
 

Attachments

  • Figure 1.png
    Figure 1.png
    32.2 KB · Views: 220
  • Figure 2.png
    Figure 2.png
    19.7 KB · Views: 224
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not acquainted with photon experiment so much. Can such a thing happen that some photons escape from all the detectors ?
 
anuttarasammyak said:
I am not acquainted with photon experiment so much. Can such a thing happen that some photons escape from all the detectors ?

I think it is possible.
 

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
448
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K