Down quarks force vs ten tonnes truck force

Orion78
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I have calculated that the strong repulsive force between two down quarks is 25.3N.
A book that I am reading said that the force of attraction between two quarks is 'equivalent to the weight of a ten tonne truck’, whose force is equals to 98000N. How can I compare the values of these two forces to explain the significance of the relative magnitude of the strong force. Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe what you have calculated is the electrostatic repulsion, not the strong force attraction.
Did you use F = k \frac {q_1 q_2}{r^2}, where k = \frac {1}{4\piε_o}?
 
yes, I used that equation to calculate the force of repulsion but with –ke = 9.0 x 10^9 N m^2 C^-2. How can I compare the values of this repulsion force between the two down quarks with the gravitational force of a 10 tonnes tanck in order to explain the significance of the relative magnitude of the strong force?
 
That's right, \frac{1}{4πε_o} has magnitude 9 x 10^9. 25.3 N is not the strong force attraction between two down quarks, it is the magnitude of electrostatic repulsion. This is why this number and 98000N are not very comparable.

Direct calculation of the strong force is not too easy:
See http://home.fnal.gov/~cheung/rtes/RTESWeb/LQCD_site/pages/calculatingtheforces.htm

I think perhaps what the question wants you to recognise that at such small distances, of the order of fm, the nuclear scale, this force is incredibly huge. (in fact, if one tries to pull quarks apart, in order to give isolated quarks, you will find you can't. Instead when the potential energy is enough will result in a quark-antiquark pair)
 
Thanks caf123, that's was very helpful!
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top