Drag coefficient w/o terminal velocity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between drag coefficient (Cd) and terminal velocity, particularly in the context of a quarter falling through air. Participants explore the challenges of calculating drag force and terminal velocity without knowing one of the variables, and the implications of Reynolds number on drag coefficient.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in finding the drag coefficient without knowing the drag force or terminal velocity, describing it as a catch-22 situation.
  • Another participant clarifies that at terminal velocity, the drag force equals the weight of the object, implying no net force and no acceleration.
  • A participant provides specific values for a quarter's weight, cross-sectional area, and density, and attempts to use the drag equation to find terminal velocity, questioning the units for drag weight.
  • It is suggested that an iterative process may be necessary to converge on a solution for Cd, as it is a function of Reynolds number.
  • One participant questions whether the relationship of Cd to Reynolds number is significant for their scenario, suggesting that if reference conditions are similar, the drag coefficient could be approximated without extensive calculations.
  • Another participant agrees that the speed changes may not be significant, indicating that the problem could be simpler than initially thought.
  • A participant notes that the quarter's orientation in air may affect its cross-sectional area, raising a question about the stability of its position during the fall.
  • Discussion includes the distinction between high Reynolds number drag forces and Stokes drag forces, with a note that the quarter may not exceed the threshold for high Reynolds number behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the relationship between drag coefficient, Reynolds number, and the specific scenario of a falling quarter. There is no consensus on the best approach to calculate the drag coefficient or terminal velocity, and multiple competing views remain regarding the significance of Reynolds number in this context.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on assumptions about the stability of the quarter's orientation and the potential variability of drag coefficient with changing conditions. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the appropriate conditions for applying different drag force models.

picklefeet
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I know the equation for terminal velocity and drag coefficient. But I can't find one without the other. It's a real catch-22. I also don't know the Drag Force. HEEELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a specific question? Also, remember, when an object reaches terminal velocity, there is no net force acting on the object (as it isn't accelerating). Hence, the drag force is of equal magnitude to the object's weight.
 
An example would be finding the terminal velocity of a quarter. the weight is 5.67g. The cross-sectional area is 4.522 cm. (rounded to the nearest thousandth.) and the density is 1.184. I have the equation Fd= 1/2*p*V^2*Cd. I get 5.67=.592*Cd*V^2. (I can't remember if drag weight is measured in grams or kilograms.) You see my problem. I stil need the velocity of the object.
 
It will have to be an iterative process. Cd is a function of Reynolds Number. You would need to guess at an original Cd. Use that Cd to calculate the speed based on your equation of motion. Use that speed to calculate Reynolds number. Finally, use that Reynolds Number to check your original guess for the Cd. Eventually it will converge on a solution.
 
FredGarvin said:
Cd is a function of Reynolds Number.
This is getting past what Aero I took, but isn't that only for situations where viscous drag changes a lot? Can't we just use this equation there: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/drageq.html

If your reference conditions aren't vastly different from the conditions you are studying (ie, if you find the Cd at 60mph and your terminal velocity is around 120), it should work out ok, shouldn't it?

Obviously, this doesn't help with the ultimate problem, of course: that drag coefficient is something that really needs to be found experimentally.
 
I was thinking in general terms. I think you're right though. The speed isn't going to be changing by that much so it should be pretty simple to get the answer. I guess we won't be covering a few orders of magnitude in Re for this.

I did look at a chart I had for a round plate perpendicular to the flow. It is a constant 1.1 over a very wide range so that makes this a very easy problem.
 
...easy if the flat plate (a quarter) falls at a stable position parallel to the ground...

I do believe that Mythbusters actually tested this, though...
 
Wouldn't the quarter turn to the stable position in air therefore making the cross sectional area equivalent to the diameter times the width of the quarter?
 
There are two basic types of drag force; drag force at high Reynold's number (Re>1000), proportional to velocity squared, and Stokes drag force (Re<1000), linearly proportional to velocity. It is not obvious the the falling quarter will exceed Re=1000. The Reynold's number is proportional to velocity times sqrt(cross section), so a small size object would have to have a very high velocity.
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics )
Also see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_number
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K