Drag force on cylinder in parallel flow

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the drag force experienced by a cylinder in parallel creeping (Stokes') flow, specifically when the flow is aligned with the axis of the cylinder. Participants explore correlations and equations relevant to this scenario, touching on theoretical aspects and existing literature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a correlation for the drag force on a cylinder in parallel flow and mentions encountering Stokes' paradox during their derivation.
  • Another participant references equations from Batchelor (1970) and Keller (1976), which utilize slender-body theory to approximate the cylinder as a line of stokeslets.
  • A participant questions the flow direction, noting that Stokes' paradox is typically associated with flow perpendicular to the cylinder and mentions an exact solution in Lamb's 'hydrodynamics' involving the Euler constant.
  • Another participant clarifies that while Stokes' paradox was originally identified for perpendicular flow, similar effects occur in parallel flow due to the relative significance of inertial versus viscous forces at large distances from the cylinder.
  • This participant also discusses the applicability of slender body theory for both flow orientations and highlights that Lamb's solution, while suitable for infinite cylinders, is not exact and involves assumptions about linear inertia in the Navier-Stokes equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of Stokes' paradox and the applicability of various theoretical approaches, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a consensus on the best method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the assumptions involved in slender-body theory and the conditions under which Lamb's solution is applicable, as well as the unresolved nature of the mathematical steps related to the drag force calculation.

MichielM
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm looking for a correlation of the drag force on a cylinder in parallel creeping (stokes') flow (i.e. the flow is alongside the axis of the cylinder). My length-to-width ratio is such that assuming an infinitely long cylinder is perfectly okay.

Does anyone know where I can find such a correlation?

I've tried deriving it myself but I ran into something called the Stokes' paradox. I know this can be solved by an approximation method (taking a linear inertia term into account), but I do not want to dive in that deep, I just need the equation for a calculation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've found useful equations from Batchelor (1970) and Keller (1976) who use 'slender-body theory' in which the rod is approximated as a line of stokeslets (singular force terms)
 
Are you asking if the flow is parallel to or or perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder?

Stokes' paradox is, IIRC, for flow perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder. There's an exact solution in Lamb's 'hydrodynamics', which is at work. It involves the Euler constant (0.577...).
 
Stokes' paradox was first found for a cylinder perpendicular to the flow, but the same effect (and for the same reason) is present for flow parallel to the cylinder. The basic problem is not the direction of flow but rather the fact the effect of inertial as compared to viscous forces are no longer negligible at large distances from the body.

As for the flow solution: slender body theory provides results for both parallel and perpendicular flow for finite cylinders. Lamb's solution is for an infinite cylinder. Although I said that would be perfectly fine given my length to width ratio, the results for slender body theory apply to finite cylinders which is more useful to me. Moreover, lamb's solution is not exact either, it also involves assuming a linear inertia term in the navier stokes equation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K