Drawing equipotential lines and field lines

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on drawing electric field lines and equipotential lines for a parallel plate electrode configuration, where one plate is positively charged and the other is grounded. Participants emphasize that electric field lines are perpendicular to equipotential lines and discuss the behavior of the electric field near the conducting surface. A user shares their attempts at drawing these lines and seeks feedback, while another contributor explains the vector sum of electric fields and the influence of charge distribution on line orientation. The conversation also touches on methods for drawing lines for off-center circles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field theory
  • Familiarity with equipotential surfaces
  • Knowledge of vector addition in electric fields
  • Basic skills in graphical representation of electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electric field lines and equipotential lines in electrostatics
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of electric fields using dipole approximations
  • Explore software tools for simulating electric fields, such as COMSOL Multiphysics
  • Research techniques for drawing complex field configurations, including off-center circles
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone interested in visualizing electric fields and equipotential lines in electrostatic configurations.

tmilford
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Draw the electric field lines and equipotential lines for the electrode configure. Assume one of the parallel plate is at a positive potential and the other one is grounded.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I know the electric field lines and equipotential lines are perpendicular. I drew the lines but am not 100% sure it's correct. I mainly have problems with the equipotential lines

Here's the original picture

http://i1209.photobucket.com/albums/cc394/alliereid1/original.png

And this is my attempt. The purple lines are the equipotential lines and the left side is positive, and black lines are the electric field lines

http://i1209.photobucket.com/albums/cc394/alliereid1/equipotential.png

It'd be great if someone could look it over to see if I'm on the right track. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
here's my attempt
attachment.php?attachmentid=32656&stc=1&d=1298876151.png


red ones are equi. pot. surfaces and purple are field lines
 

Attachments

  • aa.png
    aa.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 3,338
I like tmilford's better actually...

Close to the surface of a plate, the E-field should remain about parallel, but as you get closer to the conducting surface, the E-field bends more sharply toward its center.

The E-field at any point between the plate and the conducting surface = E_plate+E_surface (Vector Sum). The E_plate is constant for all space. The E_surface could be modeled as a dipole centered at the center of the surface with aggregate negative charge half-a-radius to the left and aggregate positive charge half-a-radius to the right along the central line. If you consider that only one end of the dipole primarily interacts with the region near its plate, then it looks like a point charge. Then points equidistant from the plate but farther away from the "aggregate charge position" have a less pronounced E-field in the direction of the center of the surface.

Also, the lines should not enter the material parallel to the horizontal central line because close to the surface of the conductor, they would point toward the "aggregate charge position."

Though I may have convoluted that explanation, that's my conceptual two-cents. I like tmilford's diagram better.
 
hey guys, don't mean to hijack this post, but how would i go about drawying equipotential and field lines for a small circle within a large one, off centre, toward the edge? is there a program to automate this?
i thought of drawing a square outside each of the circles and drawing a line from each corner, then rubbing out those squares and the result is something that looks right, although I'm not quite sure. any help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
9K