Analyzing Net Forces and Equations in a Driven Mass on a Circular Path System

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on analyzing the net forces and equations governing a driven mass system on a circular path, specifically using the equations F*cos(w) - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1'' and -k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''. Participants highlight the need for clarity in variable definitions, particularly the introduction of angular variables θ1 and θ2, and discuss potential sign errors in the equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the forces acting on the masses and the implications of their directional movement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Familiarity with spring force equations and Hooke's Law
  • Basic knowledge of circular motion dynamics
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of equations of motion for coupled oscillators
  • Learn about the role of angular displacement in circular motion systems
  • Investigate the effects of different spring constants on system behavior
  • Study the application of LaTeX in presenting complex equations clearly
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and researchers interested in dynamics and oscillatory systems will benefit from this discussion.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
All below
Relevant Equations
All below
1594764359971.png

1594764406949.png

What you think about this system:?

F*cosw - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1''
-k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''
 

Attachments

  • 1594764376191.png
    1594764376191.png
    5.2 KB · Views: 195
Physics news on Phys.org
LCSphysicist said:
What you think about this system:?

F*cosw - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1''
-k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''
It would help if you could post this using LaTeX (see the LaTeX Guide link at the lower left of the Edit window. Thanks.

Also, could you please explain the equations you are trying to write? It looks like you are trying to write F=ma type equations, but your terms are not clear to me (especially since some parts seem to be missing). Also, at some point fairly soon you will need to include the variables ##\theta_1## and ##\theta_2## to denote the positions of the two masses as functions of time...
 
LCSphysicist said:
What you think about this system:?

F*cosw - k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx1''
-k(x1+x2) - k(x1-x2) = mx2''
Some sign errors.
berkeman said:
you will need to include the variables θ1 and θ2
The x1 and x2 can be taken as angles, or arc lengths, whatever.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Maybe the problem is adopt one clockwise and another counterclockwise?
This came to my mind when i attack the problem, but i went on just to see if i could try by this another way as well as adopt just clockwise [or counterclokwise]. But what i can't refut is why would it be wrong, that is:

## F*cos(wt) - [k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x1}{dt^2} ##
## [-k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x2}{dt^2} ##

the bracket being to the left spring:
If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Works as well to x1<0

Without bracket to the right spring:

If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Also works to x1<0

About the Latex, i will try ;)
 
LCSphysicist said:
Maybe the problem is adopt one clockwise and another counterclockwise?
This came to my mind when i attack the problem, but i went on just to see if i could try by this another way as well as adopt just clockwise [or counterclokwise]. But what i can't refut is why would it be wrong, that is:

## F*cos(wt) - [k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x1}{dt^2} ##
## [-k(x1+x2)] - k(x1-x2) = m \frac{d^2 x2}{dt^2} ##

the bracket being to the left spring:
If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Works as well to x1<0

Without bracket to the right spring:

If x2 = 0 and x1 > 0, will be a force on m1 in its negative direction, as to x2. Also works to x1<0

About the Latex, i will try ;)
Consider the case x1=-x2, so both move the same direction around the hoop. What net forces will spring exert on them? What do your equations give?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
949
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K