Dropping a Cow Magnet Down a Metal Tube

AI Thread Summary
Dropping a cow magnet through different metal tubes reveals that it falls slower in copper pipes compared to steel conduits. The magnet's descent is further slowed when a copper pipe is placed inside a steel conduit, indicating a significant interaction between the materials. Thicker copper walls and narrower fittings contribute to a greater reduction in the magnet's fall speed. The phenomenon is attributed to the induced currents in the copper, which increase with the volume of the magnetic field. Overall, the combination of copper and steel pipes enhances the slowing effect on the magnet's drop.
fester225
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I came across a couple of cow magnets a while back.

When you drop a cow magnet down the center of a vertical piece of steel conduit, it doesn't drop as fast as it usually would.

When you drop a cow magnet down the center of a vertical copper plumbing pipe (closer fitting than the conduit), the magnet drops considerably slower than it usually would.

When you drop a cow magnet down the center of a vertical copper plumbing pipe which has been placed inside the steel conduit, the magnet drops still more slowly.

What will slow the magnet's drop the most? Would it be thicker copper pipe, a closer fitting, thicker walled steel pipe, or is the combination of copper and steel pipes a magic combination?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't help but seeing the magnet getting stuck to the steel conduit.
A copper pipe will slow the magnet down considerably, the thicker the pipe wall the slower the magnet falls. Also a narrower fit will slow it more. I see it this way: the more volume of magnetic field is flowing through copper, the bigger the current is generated in the pipe, and therefore the more the magnet slows down.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top