U = energy(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In the book:

[itex] \frac{dU}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{1}{2} mv^2 + \frac{1}{2} kx^2) [/itex]

then we have [itex] m \frac{d^{2}x}{dt^2} + kx = 0 [/itex] because [itex] v = \frac{dx}{dt} [/itex]

however they get rid of [itex] \frac{dx}{dt} [/itex] .

They are ignoring the case where v = 0, because then [itex] m \frac{d^{2}x}{dt^2} + kx [/itex] doesn't have to be zero, and it can still satisfy the equation.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# DU/dt = 0 for oscillating spring, help with derivation

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

Have something to add?

- Similar discussions for: DU/dt = 0 for oscillating spring, help with derivation

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**