Dummy Variable Coefficient Proof

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the OLS estimator of the dummy variable coefficient (δ) in the regression model is the difference between the sample means of observations where D_i = 1 and D_i = 0. Participants are seeking guidance on expressing the sample means mathematically and how to derive δ from the OLS slope coefficient proof. One user has reached the point of proving that δ equals cov(D_i, Y_i) / Var(D_i) but is unsure how to proceed further. Suggestions include using a small sample of observations to clarify the concept and applying the formula to aid understanding. The conversation emphasizes the need for clear mathematical expression and intuition in deriving the proof.
i_not_alone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi to all

I need to seek help with regard to this question.

Show that the OLS estimator of the dummy coefficient (\delta) in the regression model given by

Y_{i}=\beta_{1} + \deltaD_{i} + \upsilon_{i}

is equal to the difference between the sample mean of the observations for which D_{i} = 1 and the sample mean of the observations for which D _{i} =0.

You can click on the GIF file to see the question more properly.

So how do we go about solving this proof, and in mathematical form, how do we express the sample mean for observation which Di = 1 and Di = 0?

Hope I have presented myself clear! Help really needed. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • abc.GIF
    abc.GIF
    6.4 KB · Views: 604
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you study matrix algebra? Can you write the definition of the delta coefficient? You can start from the general definition of OLS coefficients in a regression equation.
 
oh hi EnumaElish!

I did not study matrix algebra but I do know about the definition of delta coefficient, using the proof for OLS slope coeffecient proof, which we derive it from the differentiation of RSS/b1 and RSS/b2.

Now, I am stuck at this stage where I have proofed delta = cov (Di,Yi) / Var (Di).. haha.. so how do i carry on to express it into the sample mean for observation which Di = 1 and Di = 0?
 
Did you try to expand the numerator and the denominator? It could help your intuition if you assume four observations (say, three 1's and one 0) then apply the formula. Then you can generalize.
 
Last edited:
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top