Dynamic physical model - automobile wheel suspension confusion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding dynamic physical models, specifically in the context of automobile wheel suspension and electric circuits. Participants seek clarification on the application of Newton's laws of motion and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, as well as the relationships between various physical quantities in these systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the purpose of equating two equations in dynamic physical models and seeks guidance on Newton's laws and their application in mechanics.
  • Another participant explains that Newton's second law, ##F = ma##, is applied, detailing the forces involved, including spring and dashpot forces.
  • Concerns are raised about potential errors in the equations presented, specifically regarding the constants and dimensions in the equations related to the spring and electric circuit analogies.
  • Questions arise about how to determine the dashpot force, with a participant providing a definition of a dashpot and its function in resisting motion.
  • Kirchhoff's Voltage Law is identified as relevant to the electric circuit discussion, with a participant providing the equation derived from this law and discussing the relationships between current and charge.
  • There is a mention of discrepancies in the literature regarding the association of spring stiffness with external forces, indicating a lack of consensus on this point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of certain laws and the correctness of equations, particularly regarding the constants used. While some participants agree on the application of Newton's laws and Kirchhoff's law, others challenge the interpretations and calculations presented, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in the equations, particularly concerning dimensional analysis, and express uncertainty about the relationships between variables in the context of electric circuits and mechanical systems.

shivajikobardan
Messages
637
Reaction score
54
Homework Statement
dynamic physical model
Relevant Equations
spring mass system equation, electric circuit equation
Been a long time I studied physics that had anything to do with mechanics, so I'm now in need of memorizing almost everything. So I am seeking for some guidance here. This is "system simulation/modeling/discrete event system simulation/etc" type of subject.

1657552151433.png

1657552164872.png

1657552183049.png


The first thing that I didn't understand is "what point are we trying to make by equating 2 equations" in relation with dynamic physical model?
While i get it that we have analogous equations in real world though.
And I didn't understand how Newton's law of motion was applied to the first figure? And what law is applied in electric circuit in second figure? Coloumb's law? I forgot why are we using derivatives of current L and R but charge q for C?

I know these equations-:

q/C=V

=>V~q

LdI/dt=V
=> V~q**

V=IR
=>V~q*

I guess it is sth like this. But not sure how exactly it was translated (but I think this much information would be enough for this exam for electric circuit part so just help me with physics mechanics part).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shivajikobardan said:
And I didn't understand how Newton's law of motion was applied to the first figure
Hi,

##F = ma## is the law applied here. ##ma## appears as ##m{d^2x\over dt^2}## and there are three forces that add up to the ##F##. Maybe the fact that they moved over two of them to the other side of the ##=## sign is what confuses you a bit ?

The spring exerts ##F_s = -kx##
The dashpot exerts ##F_d = - D\dot x = -D {dx\over dt}##
And the exernal force is ##F_t##.

The ##K## in front of that in ##(1.1)## is in error. Likewise the ##{1\over C}## in the electric analogon.
(Check the dimensions).

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shivajikobardan and jack action
BvU said:
The ##K## in front of that in ##(1.1)## is in error. Likewise the ##{1\over C}## in the electric analogon.
(Check the dimensions).

##\ ##
Every other book about this is saying the same thing(written in that book) though.
 
BvU said:
The dashpot exerts ##F_d = - D\dot x = -D {dx\over dt}
How do you find dashpot force? I didn't get this.
 
shivajikobardan said:
Every other book about this is saying the same thing(written in that book) though.
Never seen the spring stiffness associated with the external force before and it doesn't make sense anyway. From Wikipedia:
Deriving the equations of motion for this model is usually done by examining the sum of forces on the mass:

a7595e04d4f8cb59560a2be5f12170a42afb66a4

shivajikobardan said:
How do you find dashpot force? I didn't get this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dashpot said:
A dashpot, also known as a damper, is a mechanical device that resists motion via viscous friction. The resulting force is proportional to the velocity, but acts in the opposite direction, slowing the motion and absorbing energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: shivajikobardan
jack action said:
Never seen the spring stiffness associated with the external force before and it doesn't make sense anyway. From Wikipedia:
yeah not adding it doesn't make any difference.
 
shivajikobardan said:
Homework Statement:: dynamic physical model
Relevant Equations:: spring mass system equation, electric circuit equation

And what law is applied in electric circuit in second figure? Coloumb's law? I forgot why are we using derivatives of current L and R but charge q for C?
That's Kirchoff's Voltage Law which tells us the sum of potential differences around any closed loop is zero. Applying the law we get
$$E(t) - IR - L\frac{dI}{dt} - \frac{q}{C} = 0$$

You can then rephrase ##\frac{dI}{dt}## and ##I## in terms of the derivatives of charge ##q## . Does that clear your doubt?

Although like BvU said, the ##\frac{1}{C}## on the right has to be an error because the units don't add up. Hope this helped.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
haider said:
That's Kirchoff's Voltage Law which tells us the sum of potential differences around any closed loop is zero. Applying the law we get
$$E(t) - IR - L\frac{dI}{dt} - \frac{q}{C} = 0$$

You can then rephrase ##\frac{dI}{dt}## and ##I## in terms of the derivatives of charge ##q## . Does that clear your doubt?

Although like BvU said, the ##\frac{1}{C}## on the right has to be an error because the units don't add up. Hope this helped.
oh yeah KVL, thanks for the info. this helps for electric circuit doubt.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and haider

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K