Dynamics in the heizenberg picture

  • Thread starter Thread starter dudy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics Picture
dudy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello,
The time-derivative of an operator A(t) = U^\dagger a(t)U in the heizenberg picture is given by:

\frac{dA(t)}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar} [H,A(t)] + U^\dagger(\frac{da(t)}{dt})U

Now, I know that under some conditions, we can write:

\frac{dA(t)}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar} U^\dagger[H,a(t)]U + U^\dagger(\frac{da(t)}{dt})U

My question is- what are those conditions?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Under the condition that the Hamiltonian is not dependent on time.
 
is there a more specific rule?
take for example:

H = a^\dagger e^{-i\omega t} + a e^{i\omega t}

(here a is the annihilation operator).

This Hamiltonian is of course time-dependant,
but, non-the-less, it is also true that:

\frac{dA(t)}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar} U^\dagger[H,a]U

(where A(t) is the annihilation operator in heizenberg's picture)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top