Dynamics in the heizenberg picture

  • Thread starter Thread starter dudy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics Picture
dudy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello,
The time-derivative of an operator A(t) = U^\dagger a(t)U in the heizenberg picture is given by:

\frac{dA(t)}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar} [H,A(t)] + U^\dagger(\frac{da(t)}{dt})U

Now, I know that under some conditions, we can write:

\frac{dA(t)}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar} U^\dagger[H,a(t)]U + U^\dagger(\frac{da(t)}{dt})U

My question is- what are those conditions?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Under the condition that the Hamiltonian is not dependent on time.
 
is there a more specific rule?
take for example:

H = a^\dagger e^{-i\omega t} + a e^{i\omega t}

(here a is the annihilation operator).

This Hamiltonian is of course time-dependant,
but, non-the-less, it is also true that:

\frac{dA(t)}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar} U^\dagger[H,a]U

(where A(t) is the annihilation operator in heizenberg's picture)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top