Dyson's equation and Green's functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yiheng Xu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the basis independence of Dyson's equation and the formulation of the unperturbed retarded Green's function in non-orthogonal bases. It is established that Dyson's equation, represented as $$G(\mathbf{k},\omega) = G_0(\mathbf{k},\omega)+G_0(\mathbf{k},\omega)\Sigma(\mathbf{k},\omega)G(\mathbf{k},\omega)$$, is indeed basis-independent. However, when working with non-orthogonal atomic orbitals, completeness relations must be carefully applied, necessitating orthogonalization of the basis for accurate representation in the Green's function formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dyson's equation and its components
  • Familiarity with Green's functions in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of basis sets, particularly atomic orbitals
  • Concept of completeness relations in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of Dyson's equation in quantum field theory
  • Explore the formulation of Green's functions in non-orthogonal bases
  • Learn about orthogonalization techniques for basis sets in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of completeness relations in quantum mechanical calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as researchers working with Green's functions and Dyson's equation in various applications.

Yiheng Xu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Is the Dyson's equation basis independent (for instance, I construct the basis set where the elements are atomic orbitals and those orbitals are non-orthogonal) ?

What is the unperturbed retarded Green's function for one-particle case in matrix notation if the basis functions are not orthogonal?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure the general form of Dyson's equation is basis-independent (there is no reference to a basis).
$$G(\mathbf{k},\omega) = G_0(\mathbf{k},\omega)+G_0(\mathbf{k},\omega)\Sigma(\mathbf{k},\omega)G(\mathbf{k},\omega)$$
But the Green's functions are typically defined in the position basis, so you have to use completeness relations to go to the atomic orbital basis.

Edit: So if you have
$$i\hbar G^+ (\mathbf{x}_2,t_2;\mathbf{x}_1,t_1) = \theta(t_2-t_1)\langle\mathbf{x}_2|U(t_2,t_1)|\mathbf{x}_1\rangle$$
and you want to work in the energy eigenbasis ##\{\phi_n\}##, you need to insert the completeness relations in the appropriate places:
$$i\hbar G^+ (\mathbf{x}_2,t_2;\mathbf{x}_1,t_1) = \theta(t_2-t_1)\sum_{m,n}\langle\mathbf{x}_2|\phi_m\rangle\langle \phi_m|U(t_2,t_1)|\phi_n\rangle\langle \phi_n|\mathbf{x}_1\rangle$$
and since ##\langle\mathbf{x}_2|\phi_m\rangle = \phi_m(\mathbf{x}_2)##, we can rewrite this as:
$$i\hbar G^+ (\mathbf{x}_2,t_2;\mathbf{x}_1,t_1) = \theta(t_2-t_1)\sum_{m,n}\phi_m(\mathbf{x}_2)\phi_n^*(\mathbf{x}_1)\langle \phi_m|U(t_2,t_1)|\phi_n\rangle$$

Further edit (based on post #6 below): you don't have to use an orthogonal basis if you don't want to, but you can't use the completeness relations as I illustrated above. You would have to orthogonalize the non-orthogonal basis for use in the completeness relations.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K