E and H pattern of 2 element antenna array.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of deriving the E and H patterns for a two-element antenna array of Hertzian dipoles oriented in the z-direction and spaced half a wavelength apart. The user successfully calculated the H pattern, which shows expected results with no E field in the x-direction. However, when attempting to derive the E pattern at φ=0, the user encounters unexpected non-zero values for certain angles of θ, contrary to their expectations. They affirm the correctness of their equations and express confusion over why the E pattern does not align with the anticipated results based on the H pattern. The conversation seeks clarification on the relationship between the E and H patterns and the factors influencing them.
yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
294
This is not a homework, too old for that! I just have a question that I create myself. All the books only show the pattern that is more obvious...they show either the E or the H pattern. I took an exercise that asked for the H pattern, in turn, using the pattern multiplication to try to find the E pattern and ran into road block. Here is the exercise:

Given two Hertzian dipoles oriented in z-direction. Both line up on x-axis and \;d=\frac {\lambda} 2 \; apart. Both are driven by the same amplitude and phase \alpha =0. Find the E and H pattern.

From pattern multiplication:

|E(\theta, \phi)| = \frac {E_m}{R_0}\;| F(\theta, \phi)|\;\left|\cos\left(\frac {\beta d \cos\phi \sin\theta -\alpha} {2} \right)\right|

Where \;| F(\theta, \phi)|= |\sin\theta| \; is the element factor for the Hertzian dipole of each element and \;\left|\cos\left(\frac {\beta d \cos\phi \sin\theta -\alpha} 2 \right)\right| is the array factor.

The pattern function is:

| F(\theta, \phi)|\;\left|\cos\left(\frac {\beta d \cos\phi \sin\theta -\alpha} {2} \right)\right|

I have no problem getting the H pattern by just putting \;\theta=\frac {\pi}{2}. I get the two almost ball shape one on +ve y-axis and one on -ve y axis. There are no E field on x direction as expected.

But when I try to look at the E pattern at \;\phi=0, I don't get what I expected. From the H pattern above, I expect I'll get no E field at \;\phi=0 \;\hbox { and } \phi=\pi for all angle of \;\theta. But according to the pattern function:

| F(\theta, \phi)|\;\left|\cos\left(\frac {\beta d \cos\phi \sin\theta -\alpha} {2} \right)\right| = |\sin\theta| \left|\cos\left(\frac {\pi}{2}( \sin\theta ) \right)\right|

You can see it is zero when \theta= 0 \;\hbox { or }\;\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}, but it is not zero in between. Can anyone help explaining this?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Anyone?

I know the equations are correct as it is given in the book and was used to solve the H pattern. Far as my understanding, array pattern is not E or H pattern dependent, in fact it is not antenna elements dependent. It only depend on the \theta, \phi, \alpha, d.
 
Thread 'I thought it was only Amazon that sold unsafe junk'
I grabbed an under cabinet LED light today at a big box store. Nothing special. 18 inches in length and made to plug several lights together. Here is a pic of the power cord: The drawing on the box led me to believe that it would accept a standard IEC cord which surprised me. But it's a variation of it. I didn't try it, but I would assume you could plug a standard IEC cord into this and have a double male cord AKA suicide cord. And to boot, it's likely going to reverse the hot and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
4K