Earth is a inertial frame of reference

AI Thread Summary
Inertia is defined as the resistance to acceleration, and the Earth is considered a non-inertial frame of reference because it exerts an upward force on objects, preventing them from following a free-fall trajectory. While standing on Earth's surface, one is not in an inertial frame due to this gravitational influence. However, in specific contexts, such as high-energy particle physics experiments, the effects of gravity can be negligible, allowing the Earth to be treated as an inertial frame. Conversely, in scenarios like observing fluid interactions, gravity's impact must be accounted for, necessitating a different reference frame, such as a free-falling tank in space. Overall, the classification of Earth's frame depends on the context of the experiment or observation being conducted.
sulemanasif
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hi all of u
WHAT IS INERTIA? and Earth is a inertial frame of reference or non inertial frame of reference? tell me briefly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Inertia is resistance towards acceleration. If the Higgs mechanism is correct, it can be explained as interaction with the Higgs field. But Higgs has not yet been detected.

When you are standing on the surface of the earth, you are not in an inertial reference frame, because the Earth pushes you up all the time, and doesn't allow you to follow a free fall trajectory.

Torquil
 


torquil said:
Inertia is resistance towards acceleration. If the Higgs mechanism is correct, it can be explained as interaction with the Higgs field. But Higgs has not yet been detected.

When you are standing on the surface of the earth, you are not in an inertial reference frame, because the Earth pushes you up all the time, and doesn't allow you to follow a free fall trajectory.

Torquil

it means eath is a non inertial frame of reference?
 


Yes, a frame following the surface of Earth is a non-inertial reference frame. But it is all relative. E.g. for the experiments done in particle physics in accelerators, the time intervals of collisions are so short that gravity can be neglected. So in that regard, we are considering the surface of Earth to be an inertial frame.

On the other hand, if the experiment is to observe e.g. the interaction between oil and water in a tank, then the same reference system is not adequate, since we know that gravity will separate the fluid components because of their differing densities. So you would have to take the tank up into space and see how the two fluids interact when the tank is circling Earth in free fall.

Torquil
 


thanx
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
94
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top