Earth is a inertial frame of reference

AI Thread Summary
Inertia is defined as the resistance to acceleration, and the Earth is considered a non-inertial frame of reference because it exerts an upward force on objects, preventing them from following a free-fall trajectory. While standing on Earth's surface, one is not in an inertial frame due to this gravitational influence. However, in specific contexts, such as high-energy particle physics experiments, the effects of gravity can be negligible, allowing the Earth to be treated as an inertial frame. Conversely, in scenarios like observing fluid interactions, gravity's impact must be accounted for, necessitating a different reference frame, such as a free-falling tank in space. Overall, the classification of Earth's frame depends on the context of the experiment or observation being conducted.
sulemanasif
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hi all of u
WHAT IS INERTIA? and Earth is a inertial frame of reference or non inertial frame of reference? tell me briefly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Inertia is resistance towards acceleration. If the Higgs mechanism is correct, it can be explained as interaction with the Higgs field. But Higgs has not yet been detected.

When you are standing on the surface of the earth, you are not in an inertial reference frame, because the Earth pushes you up all the time, and doesn't allow you to follow a free fall trajectory.

Torquil
 


torquil said:
Inertia is resistance towards acceleration. If the Higgs mechanism is correct, it can be explained as interaction with the Higgs field. But Higgs has not yet been detected.

When you are standing on the surface of the earth, you are not in an inertial reference frame, because the Earth pushes you up all the time, and doesn't allow you to follow a free fall trajectory.

Torquil

it means eath is a non inertial frame of reference?
 


Yes, a frame following the surface of Earth is a non-inertial reference frame. But it is all relative. E.g. for the experiments done in particle physics in accelerators, the time intervals of collisions are so short that gravity can be neglected. So in that regard, we are considering the surface of Earth to be an inertial frame.

On the other hand, if the experiment is to observe e.g. the interaction between oil and water in a tank, then the same reference system is not adequate, since we know that gravity will separate the fluid components because of their differing densities. So you would have to take the tank up into space and see how the two fluids interact when the tank is circling Earth in free fall.

Torquil
 


thanx
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
94
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top