Earth's Spin & Moon: Impact on Rotation

  • Thread starter Thread starter termina
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Spin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the analogy between a motor's resistance and the Earth's rotation affected by the Moon's tidal forces. It questions whether, if the Moon's torque were removed, the Earth would regain its original spin rate. The response clarifies that unlike a motor, which relies on an external power source to regain speed, the Earth's spin is solely due to its inertia. Therefore, if the Moon's influence were eliminated, the Earth would not recover its initial spin rate. The comparison highlights fundamental differences in energy dynamics between mechanical systems and planetary motion.
termina
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello there!

When a motor is turning, if one applies a resisting torque on the rotor,
the latter would brake, but then if one remove the torque,
the motor recovers its initial speed.

Is the same with Earth's spin and Moon's resisting torque on it (due to tidal effect)?
ie: if, one day, the aforementioned torque is put off, would our planet recover its initial spin rate?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
termina said:
Hello there!

When a motor is turning, if one applies a resisting torque on the rotor,
the latter would brake, but then if one remove the torque,
the motor recovers its initial speed.

Is the same with Earth's spin and Moon's resisting torque on it (due to tidal effect)?
ie: if, one day, the aforementioned torque is put off, would our planet recover its initial spin rate?

No. The motor is driven from an outside power source which supplies the energy needed to bring the motor up to speed. The Earth's spin is just due to its own inertia and there is no power source to speed it up again.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top