Easy standard deviation problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the standard deviation of a family's monthly expenses over a year, given that the average expense remains unchanged after adding the 12th month's expense. The original poster presents two questions: determining the 12th month's expense and recalculating the standard deviation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the average remaining unchanged and question how this affects the standard deviation. There is confusion regarding the formulas for standard deviation, particularly the use of "n" versus "n-1" as divisors. Some participants express uncertainty about the calculations and the underlying assumptions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the standard deviation calculations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the formulas and the significance of knowing the mean beforehand. Participants are actively engaging with the problem and attempting to clarify their understanding.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding the correct formula to use for standard deviation, as well as the implications of whether the data represents a sample or a population. Participants are also grappling with the algebraic manipulation of the equations involved.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The average monthly expense of a certain family during 11 months is 4000 shekels, with a standard deviation of 100 shekels.

Afterwards they added to the calculations the family's expense at the 12th month, and they found the average remained unchanged.

A) What was the family expense in the 12th month
B) Calculate the standard deviation


The Attempt at a Solution



Question A is easy, 4000.

Question B I thought was also easy, but I'm getting the wrong answer.

In my mind it should stay a 100!

The standard deviation so far was a 100, so I kept it like that, added the 12th month expense minus the average squared, all under square root, and I get a 100. Turns out it's not the answer. I'm not sure where my booboo is. Can anyone help me see it?

http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/7995/71798093.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the average remained the same, their expenditures in the 12th month were the same as the average, which you already know. However, the st. dev. should decrease.

In the calculation for the st. dev. for the first 11 months, there is a divisor of 10. For the calculation of the standard deviation for the whole year, the divisor will be 11, and the sum of the squared differences will be the same as before, since the squared difference between the expenditure for the month and the average expenditure are equal, x - x-bar is zero.
 
Ah, thanks Mark! I again must be using the wrong formula that I miswrote in my notebook. But some sources make the number you divide by "n", some make it "n-1", I'm not clear on which is true!
 
Femme_physics said:
Ah, thanks Mark! I again must be using the wrong formula that I miswrote in my notebook. But some sources make the number you divide by "n", some make it "n-1", I'm not clear on which is true!

They are both true, since standard deviations come in 2 flavors.
If this is the same notebook as the previous time, they'll be using "n".

Knowing this the calculation of the standard deviation in this case is still not trivial...
 
Ah. I think I get it. Its depends whether it's an even or an odd number :)
 
Femme_physics said:
Ah. I think I get it. Its depends whether it's an even or an odd number :)

No not quite. :wink:

I see you're eager to learn, so I'll try to explain.
Skip to the end if you think it's boring. ;)

It depends on whether you know the mean exactly beforehand, or whether you need the numbers to calculate the mean.

If you need the numbers to calculate the mean, the mean isn't quite accurate, and this shows in the fact that the standard deviation is slightly bigger.
This means you divide by "n-1".
This is called the "sample mean" respectively the "sample standard deviation".

If you know the mean beforehand exactly, it means there is no uncertainty left in the mean.
This shows in a standard deviation that is slightly smaller, and you divide by "n".
This is called the "population mean" respectively the "population standard deviation".

In your field of expertise, I don't think you'll ever know any mean beforehand exactly.
So you should always use the divider "n-1".

However, in your notebook they obviously use the other form, which is not wrong if you consider the numbers to represent the entire "population". So if you want the same answers as your solution manual, you'll probably have to use the divider "n".


So, that was quite a long story (and you may need a couple of examples to get it).
Now could you please do the problem? :wink:
 
I'll use the divider "n" from now on then :)

Oh yea -- the problem! You did notice I was trying to smile and thank my way out of it, didn't you? ^^ Darn it, can't get anything around you! Okay, okay!

Since 1100/11 = 100

Then 1100/12 = 91.666667
 
Femme_physics said:
I'll use the divider "n" from now on then :)

Oh yea -- the problem! You did notice I was trying to smile and thank my way out of it, didn't you? ^^ Darn it, can't get anything around you! Okay, okay!

Since 1100/11 = 100

Then 1100/12 = 91.666667

Not quite! :wink:

You're using a normal average here to find the standard deviation.
But standard deviations are made up from a square root of a sum of squares divided by a number.

So what you would have for the first 11 months is:

[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{(month1 - 4000)^2 + (month2 - 4000)^2 + ... + (month11 - 4000)^2}{11} } = 100[/tex]

and what you need, is:

[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{(month1 - 4000)^2 + (month2 - 4000)^2 + ... + (month11 - 4000)^2 + (4000 - 4000)^2}{12} } = ?[/tex]

Can you calculate this?
 
Hmm. Am I suppose to guess what's in month 1, 2, 3... etc? It's as though I have 11 unknowns in one equation!
 
  • #10
Femme_physics said:
Hmm. Am I suppose to guess what's in month 1, 2, 3... etc? It's as though I have 11 unknowns in one equation!

Yes, you have 11 unknowns in one equation. :)

But suppose we define:
[tex]S =(month1 - 4000)^2 + (month2 - 4000)^2 + ... + (month11 - 4000)^2[/tex]

and substitute that.
Suddenly those 11 unknowns have become 1 unknown! :smile:
 
  • #11
Do I plug it in like that? I get zero! (no scanner, but I got a lame webcam :D - hope img is clear)
 

Attachments

  • eqget.jpg
    eqget.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 381
  • #12
Femme_physics said:
Do I plug it in like that? I get zero! (no scanner, but I got a lame webcam :D - hope img is clear)

The image is clear :)

[edit] Seems you plugged the webcam in ok! :smile: [/edit]

It seems right, although you left off the square root.
Furthermore you have another equation from which you can deduce the value of S.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
:)

Alright, I'll try the 1st equation first.
It seems right, although you left off the square root.
So I'm left with an unknown, under a square root, divided by 12 equals 0?

That's...still S = zero, no?
 
  • #14
Femme_physics said:
:)

Alright, I'll try the 1st equation first.

So I'm left with an unknown, under a square root, divided by 12 equals 0?

That's...still S = zero, no?

Uhh, no it does not equal 0, and neither does S.

[edit]What you wrote down, is what you need to calculate. The outcome is as yet unknown.[/edit]
 
Last edited:
  • #15
According to my calculations, S must equal zero for the equation to make any sense. Either my algebra is messed, or I'm not sure what...
 

Attachments

  • equalzero.jpg
    equalzero.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 387
  • #16
Femme_physics said:
According to my calculations, S must equal zero for the equation to make any sense. Either my algebra is messed, or I'm not sure what...

You're setting the equation to zero, which it is not.

Try this equation:
[tex] \sqrt{ \frac{S}{11} } = 100[/tex]

Can you solve it for S?

And then substitute that value of S in your expression. You'll find it is not zero, but the answer you're looking for.

Btw, be careful with the square root symbol. In your last scan you put down the square root sign wrong.
 
  • #17
Let's see. If I do the manipulation it's

s/11 = 1002
s/11 = 10000
s = 10000 x 11
s = 110000

Right?
 
  • #18
Femme_physics said:
Let's see. If I do the manipulation it's

s/11 = 1002
s/11 = 10000
s = 10000 x 11
s = 110000

Right?

Right! :smile:
 
  • #19
So according to my calculation, if we add something that adds up to 0, then all we need to do is110000/12 = 9166.6666

Take the square root of it and...

S = 95.742
 
  • #20
Femme_physics said:
So according to my calculation, if we add something that adds up to 0, then all we need to do is


110000/12 = 9166.6666

Take the square root of it and...

S = 95.742

Yep! :smile:

Does it match your solution manual?
 
  • #21
I love hearing a string of "yep!" with that smiley ;)

And yes, it does match :) You rock!
 
  • #22
Femme_physics said:
I love hearing a string of "yep!" with that smiley ;)

And yes, it does match :)

You rock!

You have just ensured yourself of my continued attention! :smile:
Let's rock together! :cool:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K