Economics Majors & Career Advice: What's the Best Choice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter complexPHILOSOPHY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Economics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the employability and academic depth of various economics specializations, particularly Economic Theory, and the integration of a pure mathematics major. While Economic Theory is appealing, concerns about its job prospects beyond academia are raised. Participants note that undergraduate economics courses often lack rigorous mathematical content, primarily focusing on basic calculus and statistics, despite the theoretical reliance on advanced mathematical models. There is a perception that economics is not as mathematically intensive at the undergraduate level as some might expect, with many courses being more qualitative. The conversation also touches on the potential for combining economics with applied mathematics for better career synergy, while acknowledging that individual preferences for specific economic fields vary. Overall, the emphasis is on choosing a path that aligns with personal interests and strengths, while recognizing the limitations of mathematical rigor in standard economics programs.
complexPHILOSOPHY
Messages
365
Reaction score
2
Assuming I were to major in Economics, there are a few different specializations available: Business Economics, Macroeconomics and Finance, Economic Theory, Econometrics and Empirical Economics, and International Economics and Development.

Economic Theory seems the most appealing to me, however, I am not sure how employable this major is and what career options I would have, aside from academia. In conjunction with one of these economics specializations, I want to do a second major in pure maths, although, I think applied maths would have better synergy with an economics degree, but I enjoy the study of pure mathematics more.

Any information and advice regarding this situation, would be highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Based on the economics courses I took as an undergrad, I've got to say none of them delve too deeply into mathematics even though most of the models rely heavily on mathematics for justification. It's just your average economics major can't handle all that much math.

I don't know much about employability of the subjects, but it's always best to choose what you like and do well. I tend to like macroeconomics and international economics the best out of those. Microeconomic theory seems a little too dull to me. Same with econometrics. But to each his own.
 
AsianSensationK said:
Based on the economics courses I took as an undergrad, I've got to say none of them delve too deeply into mathematics even though most of the models rely heavily on mathematics for justification. It's just your average economics major can't handle all that much math.

I don't know much about employability of the subjects, but it's always best to choose what you like and do well. I tend to like macroeconomics and international economics the best out of those. Microeconomic theory seems a little too dull to me. Same with econometrics. But to each his own.

There is not much mathematics actually used in economics? I was under the impression economists use high-level mathematics and computer models.
 
There is not much mathematics actually used in economics? I was under the impression economists use high-level mathematics and computer models.

Economics is widely known as "the dismal science". The grand theoretical aspect of the subject is a farce, IMO, just a bunch of mathematical gee-whiz where such-and-such convex model is shown to have an equilibrium i.e. non-constructive existence theorems which make too many unrealistic assumptions to seem powerful or interesting.

Then you mention computer models. If you like statistics and stochastic processes this could be a way to go, but these guys seem to be 20 years behind the cutting edge of nonlinear dynamics found in physics or applied math. Here there is a lot of constructive predictive work, and this is the sort of economist who is hired in industry.

Honestly, the only reasons I can think to recommend economics are (1) worried about your future earning potential, would rather be a big fish in little pond or (2) you want to go theoretical and be a pioneer.

I once had a economics teacher who said "what could be more interesting then money". I guess if you agree with him, that might be a reason to become an economist as well.
 
There isn't much mathematics in undergraduate economics. The two mathematical oriented econ classes are probably mathematical econ and econometrics. However in regular school they are just calculus and statistics for econ.
You can make it be more mathematical than it supposed to be yourself. Study on stochastic calculus and BSM model can advanced you from many other students.
 
complexPHILOSOPHY said:
There is not much mathematics actually used in economics? I was under the impression economists use high-level mathematics and computer models.
It is mathematical, but as an undergrad it's at the level of elementary algebra, calculus, and some statistics in econometrics.

I didn't take any electives for the major though, just the core courses at michigan (intermediate micro, intermediate macro, intro econometrics). I suppose some undergrads could elect to take more advanced courses their fourth year.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top