- #31
Smurf
- 441
- 3
Antiphon said:
I don't know if you were serious or kidding, but it's funny either way.
Last edited:
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the concept of progressive income tax (PIT), examining arguments for and against its implementation. Participants explore the implications of PIT on wealth distribution, fairness, and government revenue, while also considering alternative tax systems such as flat and regressive taxes. The scope includes theoretical, conceptual, and practical aspects of taxation in economics.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
- Exploratory
Main Points Raised
- Some participants argue that progressive income tax is unfair as it penalizes individuals who work hard to achieve wealth.
- Others propose that a flat tax system could lead to a significant loss in government revenue, disproportionately affecting lower-income individuals.
- There are claims that a regressive tax system is detrimental, with one participant expressing dissatisfaction with wealth concentration among the top 1% of asset holders.
- Some participants highlight the importance of welfare and social programs, suggesting that progressive taxes are necessary to support those in need.
- One participant presents several benefits of progressive taxation, including increased government revenue, equity in wealth distribution, and the notion that lower-income individuals spend a higher percentage of their income on needs.
- Concerns are raised about the potential negative impact of lower taxes on purchasing power and inflation, with some arguing that higher PITs are not harmful.
- There is a discussion about the definition of "fairness" in taxation, with suggestions that it may vary based on individual perspectives.
- One participant questions the theoretical basis for differentiating between needs and wants in taxation, seeking clarification on its origins.
- Another perspective emphasizes the importance of what is taxed rather than the progressivity or regressivity of the tax itself, advocating for a focus on economic effects.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a range of competing views regarding the fairness and effectiveness of progressive income tax, with no clear consensus reached. Some support progressive taxation for its potential benefits to society, while others argue against it based on perceived unfairness and economic implications.
Contextual Notes
Participants note various assumptions about fairness, the role of government, and the impact of different tax systems on economic behavior. The discussion reflects a lack of resolution on the definitions and implications of progressive versus regressive taxation.
I don't know if you were serious or kidding, but it's funny either way.
- #32
Smurf
- 441
- 3
The Greek democracy was far different from what we know it as today (specifically liberal representative democracy)Antiphon said:
No, Capitalism is an economic system where most means of production are privately owned (hence capitalism - private aquisition of capital). It shouldn't be confused with Free Market and Laissez-Faire economic theory, which have to do with a Planned vs. Market economy.
Last edited:
- #33
Smurf
- 441
- 3
Interestingly enough Democracy seems almost counter productive to individual rights. The idea of 'Rule of the majority' is inherently 'might is right', and favours benefit to society over benefit to the individual in almost all areas.Antiphon said:
- #34
russ_watters
Mentor
- 23,829
- 11,305
There is a reason they called it Laissez-faire capitalism, Smurf - the terms go together. You're making a distinction where there isn't one.