Edge Colouring of Bipartite Graphs: Proving Valency Equality

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephane G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Edge Graphs
Stephane G
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Prove by induction on the number of edges in a graph that any bipartite graph has edge colouring number equal to its maximum valency. Also, Find such an edge colouring for a bipartite 4-regular cartesian or tensor product of your choice of 2-regular graphs
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Stephane G said:
Prove by induction on the number of edges in a graph that any bipartite graph has edge colouring number equal to its maximum valency. Also, Find such an edge colouring for a bipartite 4-regular cartesian or tensor product of your choice of 2-regular graphs

Hey Stephane G and welcome to the forums.

For these kinds of questions, we ask that you show any working and any of your thinking before we help with these kinds of problems, since it is in the form of a homework problem (note it doesn't have to be a homework problem, just in the format of one).

What ideas do you have? What have you tried before?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top