Editing Posts: A Tutorial and Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pyrrhus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Editing posts is limited to a 24-hour window to prevent confusion from significant content changes. After this period, users can request a mentor to make edits, especially if it alters the thread's direction. The forum does not support LaTeX in blogs, which limits their utility for certain users. A suggested workaround for editing after the time limit is to quote the original post, create a new one with edits, and then ask a mentor to replace the original. This ensures the updated content is available immediately while preserving the original discussion.
Pyrrhus
Homework Helper
Messages
2,180
Reaction score
0
Hello PF, I've never thought much about the importance of editing threads, but as i started a tutorial, it has become important to me. I wonder, why can't we keep editing our posts? and why is the time for editing so low? and what is the exact figure of such time?


Cyclovenom.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I can't answer the why questions, but you can edit a post for 24 hours after you post.
 
The reason you can only edit a post within 24 hours is to prevent people from going back and changing the content of their posts and possibly causing confusion in the thread if the edits change the meaning.

If you need to have edits done after 24 hours you can ask a mentor to do the edit. That way, if the edit significantly changes the direction of the thread, we can decide how best to handle it, such as split off subsequent posts into a new thread.
 
Evo said:
The reason you can only edit a post within 24 hours is to prevent people from going back and changing the content of their posts and possibly causing confusion in the thread if the edits change the meaning.

If you need to have edits done after 24 hours you can ask a mentor to do the edit. That way, if the edit significantly changes the direction of the thread, we can decide how best to handle it, such as split off subsequent posts into a new thread.

Thanks, i guess i'll require your services in the near future then :shy: . :cool:
 
One could also write the tutorial in your PF-blog (formerly, Journal), which you can freely edit.

Unfortunately, it doesn't support \LaTeX (which renders it of limited use to me). Such a feature would have been nice, especially since the \LaTeX preview feature was broken. In addition, the blog would have been a good place to compose over time multiple future [\LaTeX enhanced] posts.
 
My suggestion, if you're working on a tutorial and your editing time expires, is to quote your post, do all your editing in a new post (in the same thread), and then contact a mentor (or report the post) to replace the original with the edited version. That way, we can just copy your entire post and not lose something in the process. And, the updated version will be available immediately in the thread without having to wait for one of us to have time to assist with the editing.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top