EE Grad studies - Canada with low gpa

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by a participant (OP) with a low GPA (2.6) in Electrical Engineering, seeking advice on pursuing graduate studies in Canada. The OP expresses dissatisfaction with their educational experience, citing issues such as ineffective teaching, perceived bias, and financial constraints. Participants explore potential pathways to graduate school without raising the GPA, including work experience and the weight of recent academic performance.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • The OP feels that their low GPA is not entirely reflective of their abilities due to various external factors, including ineffective teaching and perceived bias against international students.
  • Some participants suggest that staying an extra year to raise the GPA may not be necessary, as work experience could also enhance graduate school applications.
  • One participant notes that many graduate programs in Canada typically require a minimum GPA of 3.0 for consideration, but some programs may weigh recent academic performance more heavily.
  • Another participant shares a personal experience of a junior engineer with a similar GPA who excelled in the workforce, suggesting that practical experience can sometimes outweigh academic performance in job applications.
  • Concerns are raised about the overall quality of university education, with some participants agreeing that many professors do not effectively teach, which may contribute to students' struggles.
  • One participant questions whether the OP's negative experiences are indicative of a broader issue in higher education, suggesting that the OP may be blaming the school for their own challenges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the OP's situation. While some acknowledge the difficulties faced by the OP, others challenge the notion that the educational environment is solely to blame for low academic performance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path forward for the OP.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about the educational system, the weight of GPA in graduate admissions, and the potential impact of work experience. There is an acknowledgment of differing experiences in university education, but no consensus on the overall quality or effectiveness of such programs.

Ngineer
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

I need your advice here. I am in my last term in EE in a fairly reputable school in Canada (or so they say). Due to a variety of factors, my gpa is pretty embarrassing (I am looking forward to graduate with a 2.6x gpa)

I understand this is well below the 3.0 line for grad studies, which I am very interested in. However, I am not interested in spending an extra year just to get my gpa above 3.0. Some of the reasons why:

- Many of the courses were really a measure of how well students can copy assignment solutions and labs.
I am not interested in spending a year cheating. There were courses in which I got A's on the midterms, and others who got C's, but consistently copied assignment solutions, got a better final grade. Professors know and they couldn't care less.

- Extremely incompetent professors: with few exceptions, almost everything I have learned was from self-study. We have a professor that doesn't teach anything at all (keeps talking about his family), another "head of a department" who occasionally gives us hints he lacks the basics of electrical engineering (and ridicules people who argue with him), not to mention some foreign professors who have accents so heavy that you can't even tell if they are good or bad professors.

- bias: I am not entirely sure of this, but as an international student, there have been situations where I felt there was preferential treatment towards local students. Ironically, most professors who are like this are foreign.

- Financial issues, tuition is pretty expensive at this school.

I am not entirely blaming the school for my bad grades, I've been through pretty tough times during the last few years and was generally in a horrible state.

Ironically, most of the grad students in this school are from foreign countries (including my own), where I know you can get a 3.0 gpa with a fraction of the work I do. You can easily tell that some of the TA's are entirely clueless.

I really, really, don't want this to be the end of it. Judging by impressions from my personal projects and research work, I strongly feel that I have something to contribute to this field.

Is spending an extra year/term the only way to get in grad studies? If, say, I graduate with a low gpa, and do some work on my own. Does this mean anything if I apply to a Masters/PhD program?

Your advice is highly appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ngineer said:
Your advice is highly appreciated

It sounds like none of this is your fault and the school has nothing to teach you. Why stay another year? My question is, why did you spend four years at a place that was so terrible?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kilo Vectors
I keep wondering that too. That's why I am looking for ways to make up for my low grades without having to stay in this place for longer.
 
To the OP: I am from Canada, so I'm curious as to which school you are attending. If you don't want to disclose this information in this thread, send me a private message (you can do this by clicking my ID handle in this post and click "Start a Conversation").
 
I can release this information 3 months from now ;)
 
*bump*
 
I can't speak specific to engineering, but in Canada most graduate programs require a minimum 3.0 just to be considered for admission. So if you really want to pursue a master's or a PhD, you need to find some way to raise that GPA. In Canada it's common to weight the GPA more heavily towards your more recent years - some programs will look at only the last two years of study, for example.
 
While 2.6 GPA isn't stellar, it is enough to graduate and get into the work force. Once there, many employers do offer incentives and assistance for you to get into grad school. If you (or your employer) are paying your way, often grad programs are more lenient in letting you in (relatively speaking ie you will likely get into Grad school if you are in the work force for a year or so, especially if you follow up with a good GRE exam score).
.
As for getting a job, I had a junior engineer with a similar GPA to yours and he far excelled above the other engineers who had typically much higher GPAs. Of course he had some good reasons for his less than stellar GPA, family, kids, job, all while attending engineering school full time.
 
Ngineer said:
- Many of the courses were really a measure of how well students can copy assignment solutions and labs.
I am not interested in spending a year cheating. There were courses in which I got A's on the midterms, and others who got C's, but consistently copied assignment solutions, got a better final grade. Professors know and they couldn't care less.

- Extremely incompetent professors: with few exceptions, almost everything I have learned was from self-study. We have a professor that doesn't teach anything at all (keeps talking about his family), another "head of a department" who occasionally gives us hints he lacks the basics of electrical engineering (and ridicules people who argue with him), not to mention some foreign professors who have accents so heavy that you can't even tell if they are good or bad professors.

- bias: I am not entirely sure of this, but as an international student, there have been situations where I felt there was preferential treatment towards local students. Ironically, most professors who are like this are foreign.

- Financial issues, tuition is pretty expensive at this school.

While I did not attend this university, I have withdrawn from one back home because of similar reasons (attended for less than one semester). You did not capitalize where you should have! It is like this everywhere..Professors don't teach anything here too. They just walk in, read from the slides, and go to their next class. It actually does sound like you are blaming the school for your mistakes. In my honest opinion, I don't doubt that you worked hard..but almost all university education is like this! so are you sure the right thing to do is to go into graduate school? I am sure it would be nearly the same. I have mental problems and am considering dropping out of education altogether, it simply does not suit some people believe me.
 
  • #10
Kilo Vectors said:
While I did not attend this university, I have withdrawn from one back home because of similar reasons (attended for less than one semester). You did not capitalize where you should have! It is like this everywhere..Professors don't teach anything here too. They just walk in, read from the slides, and go to their next class. It actually does sound like you are blaming the school for your mistakes. In my honest opinion, I don't doubt that you worked hard..but almost all university education is like this! so are you sure the right thing to do is to go into graduate school? I am sure it would be nearly the same. I have mental problems and am considering dropping out of education altogether, it simply does not suit some people believe me.

Do you really think that a sample size of less than one semester of classes at a single university is large enough to conclude "all university education is like this?"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K