Effect of a charge's own field on itself (Feynman Lec. Vol. [I]-28 )

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the unresolved issue of a charge's self-field as presented in Feynman's Lectures, Part I, Chapter 28. The challenge arises when attempting to calculate the field generated by a charge acting on itself, leading to undefined mathematical operations. As of 2019, while classical point particles are deemed approximations, the Landau-Lifshitz modification of the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation offers a more accurate framework. Additionally, the use of continuum mechanics provides an alternative approach that avoids these complications entirely.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically charge interactions.
  • Familiarity with Feynman's Lectures on Physics, particularly Volume I.
  • Knowledge of the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation and its modifications.
  • Basic principles of continuum mechanics in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Landau-Lifshitz modification of the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation.
  • Explore continuum mechanics and its applications in modern physics.
  • Read "Relativity Matters" by J. Rafelski for further insights on the topic.
  • Investigate the implications of classical point particle approximations in theoretical physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of electromagnetism, and researchers interested in the foundational challenges of electromagnetic theory and the implications of self-fields in particle physics.

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
799
From Feynman's Lectures, Part I , Ch. 28
There was a problem that was not quite solved at the end of the 19th century. When we try to calculate the field from all the charges including the charge itself that we want the field to act on, we get into trouble trying to find the distance, for example, of a charge from itself, and dividing something by that distance, which is zero. The problem of how to handle the part of this field which is generated by the very charge on which we want the field to act is not yet solved today. So we leave it there; we do not have a complete solution to that puzzle yet, and so we shall avoid the puzzle for as long as we can.
Purely in terms of predictive success and useful applications, what kind of physical / practical problems are we not able to calculate because of this gap in our understanding? Have things become clearer in any way, as of 2019?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FAPP there's nothing we can't handle with appropriate approximations. The point is that classical point particles don't exist, i.e., they are at best an approximation. The resolution FAPP is to use not the Abraham-Lorentz-Dirac equation but the modification by Landau and Lifshitz of it, which is accurate to the same order of approximation but doesn't suffer from all the trouble.

Another way out, known for more than 100 years, is not to use point-particle mechanics in relativity at all but only continuum mechanics, where no problems of this kind exist.

For a nice discussion, see

J. Rafelski, Relativity Matters, Springer International
Publishing AG, Cham (2017).
https://dx.doi.org/1007/978-3-319-51231-0
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: kith, Swamp Thing, Delta2 and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
930
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
974
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K