Effect of inserting an analyzer loop in the EPR experiment

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kurt101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Epr Experiment Loop
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 1K views
kurt101
Messages
285
Reaction score
35
TL;DR
Does inserting an analyzer loop in the EPR experiment with photons affect the non-local correlation in this experiment?
Given an EPR experiment such as the Alain Aspect 1982 test of non-locality using photons; if you modified the experiment so that the entangled photons first go through a analyzer loop (polarizer + inverse polarizer) before going to the polarizers in the experiment would you still see a non-local correlation between the entangled photons in this experiment?

A loop analyzer is a polarizer and its inverse polarizer that does not change the polarization as show in the following diagram:

loop-analyzer.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DrChinese said:
According to this analysis, it would:
"It would" what? I did a first read through the thought experiment you posted and my understanding is that an analyzer loop that looks like:
loop-analyzer2.PNG

has no effect on the outcome and you still get the Bell violation whether it is there or not. Am I misunderstanding?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • loop-analyzer2.PNG
    loop-analyzer2.PNG
    1.2 KB · Views: 187
Sorry, I wasn't clear: "Would you still see a non-local correlation between the entangled photons in this experiment?"

Yes, you would. The only issue is that I am not aware of an experimental demonstration of this. But maybe someone else knows... :smile: and I would love to see that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kurt101