Effect of number of coils on current in a generator?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the number of coils in a generator and the current produced when a magnet is dropped through them. The experiment involved two setups: one with 100 coils and another with 200 coils. The results indicated that the current generated increased from 0.07 A to 0.085 A, confirming that while adding coils increases the induced electromotive force (emf), it does not result in a proportional increase in current due to factors such as wire resistance and varying speeds of the falling magnet. The findings emphasize the importance of maintaining consistent experimental conditions for accurate measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic induction principles
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law and resistance in electrical circuits
  • Knowledge of how to measure current using appropriate tools
  • Basic physics concepts related to motion and magnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction
  • Research methods to minimize resistance in wire coils
  • Learn about using oscilloscopes for accurate current measurement
  • Investigate the effects of varying the speed of the magnet on induced current
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting physics experiments, educators teaching electromagnetic principles, and hobbyists interested in generator design and performance optimization.

Jacob Skowronek
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone and thank you for your replies in advance. I am currently doing a physics project where I am testing to see how the number of coils of wire effects the current generated when a magnet is run through the coil. I am currently just dropping the magnet through the coil from a constant height (the coils are around a paper towel tube) but I am finding it difficult to get consistent readings. Based on the readings I have gotten, doubling the number of coils (one tube has 100 coils and the other has 100 coils and 100 more on top of those) does not double the current produced. I assume this is because the wire has greater resistance since it is much longer. I am just wondering if these are the results I should be getting, or have I completely messed up? Thank you again for all your replies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The induced emf. depends on the change of magnetic flux. For every coil, the emf. can be accumulated. Hence the more the coils you equip, the more emf. you will generate, hence the more current. However simultaneously you need more power to initiate the generator.
 
So more current will be produced if I add more coils, but the current will not double if I double the number of coils without changing the speed of the magnet?
 
The speed of the magnet shouldn't have to be changed. I mean you have to have more power to maintain the same speed.
That's the result you get from your experiment?
 
If u r just dropping the magnet then the speed of the magnet is not constant throughout the drop. It will be less in first half and as compared to second half. So the rate of change of magnetic flux is not the same through the two coils(assuming the coils are one above the other) . Apart from this the coils should be exactly identical in terms of size (diameter) ,material etc.
 
The result I get is (though I am finding it hard to get accurate measurements), when I have 100 coils of copper wire around the tube and I drop a magnet through, the current produced is about 0.07 A. However when wrap 100 more coils on top of the 100 coils that are already there, and then I drop a magnet through from the same height, the current generated is about 0.085 A. However, I am having a difficult time measuring the current since it happens so quickly, so I am wondering if they should both be the same current, if the one with 200 coils should be higher but not doubled, or if the one with 200 coils should produce double the current?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K