Effect of Varying Ball Size in Newton's Cradle

  • Thread starter Thread starter d4rr3n
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a Newton's cradle with balls of varying sizes, the smaller balls are expected to move with greater velocities than the larger ones due to the conservation of kinetic energy and momentum transfer. When a larger ball strikes smaller balls, the kinetic energy is transmitted through the decreasing mass, causing the last ball to accelerate away faster than the initial ball. The motion of the system will not be periodic as it is with equal-mass balls, but specific mass ratios can create interesting patterns. The discussion highlights that all balls will move forward after a collision, contrary to the traditional expectation that only the last ball moves. This variation in ball size alters the dynamics significantly compared to a standard Newton's cradle setup.
d4rr3n
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
In a Newtons cradle the ball at one end of the ball train moves with similar velocity to the other minus the gradual slowing due to loss of energy in both.

What would be the result if I made a Newtons cradle in which the size/mass of the balls gradually decrease?
My instinct tells me that the small ball will move with several times grater velocity then the large ball but not sure why. Also assuming that assertion in correct is it necessary to have a great number of balls of different sizes, what is the minimum number that would result in the same velocity difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the large ball was lifted and released, when it struct the others, all would tend to spread out.
If the small one was lifted and release, it would bounce off, and again, the balls would tend to spread.
In general, the motion would not become periodic as it is with the equal-mass cradle. But you could probably find mass ratios for the balls that would create interesting periodic patterns.
 
If the large ball was lifted and released would not its kinetic energy be transmitted through the decreasing size balls causing the last to accelerate away from the others with a grater velocity then the large ball that initiated the process?
 
d4rr3n said:
If the large ball was lifted and released would not its kinetic energy be transmitted through the decreasing size balls causing the last to accelerate away from the others with a grater velocity then the large ball that initiated the process?
Let's say that the masses were 4, 2, 1.
4 hits 2 with velocity 1.
-- The average velocity is reduce by the mass increase by (4/6) to 0.667, but they will still recede from each other at v=1.
-- So 4 moves forward at 0.667-0.333 = 0.333.
-- 2 moves forward at 0.667 + 0.667 = 1.333.
2 immediately hits 1 with velocity 1.333
-- The average velocity is reduced by the mass increase by (2/3) to 0.8889, but they will still recede from each other at v=1.333.
-- So 2 moves forward at 0.8889-0.4444 = 0.4444. This is still faster that the 4 ball, so there is no further collision.
-- 1 moves away at 0.88889+0.88889 = 1.77778.

So immediately after 4 strikes 1 and 2 all move forward: 4 at 0.333; 2 at 0.444; and 1 at 1.778.
 
In a Newtons cradle when one ball strikes one end only the last moves forward, the force is merely transmitted through the others...but you are saying they will all move forward? In the example you gave I would expect 4 to strike 2 and 1 to rapidly accelerate away from 2, I would expect 2 to hardly move but merely act as a path of the kinetic energy.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top