Undergrad Understanding the Derivation of Effective Mass Approximation in Semiconductors

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the effective mass approximation in semiconductors, specifically how the Hamiltonian for electrons at the conduction band minimum can be expressed as H = p^2/2m*. It highlights the need to rigorously derive this from the band structure, which is often approximated as parabolic around the conduction band minimum. The conversation suggests that this involves solving for wave numbers k and approximating the dispersion relation, with the effective mass serving as a fitting parameter. It also notes the practical utility of the effective mass approximation for experimentalists in aligning theoretical models with experimental results. Understanding this derivation is crucial for accurately modeling semiconductor behavior.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I have noticed that in a lot of theoretical modelling of semiconductors you assume that the electrons living in the bottom of the conduction band obey a free particle Hamiltonian:

H = p^2/2m*

, where m* is the effective mass in the conduction band and p^2 is the usual differential operator. I am not sure how this is derived rigourously. I suppose you solve the band structure and show that as a function of k the band structure is parabolic in k about the minimum of the conduction band:

E ≈ E0 + ħ^2k^2/2m*

But how do you rigorously go from this expression, which contains the wave numbers k = (kx,ky,kz) back to differential operators? I hope you understand my question.
 
I am not sure how it is rigorously defined, no doubt it has to do with the potential in the semiconductor. Perhaps you must find the actual wave numbers and approximate the dispersion relation to a parabolic one within the band of interest, with mass adjusted as fitting parameter? For the experimentalists the effective mass approximation is useful for describing results, so in some cases the aim for a theorist would be to obtain a matching effective mass value in a model that explains their experimental results.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K