Effective resistance in a pentagram of resistors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing a circuit configuration of resistors arranged in a pentagram shape, with the goal of determining the effective resistance between adjacent joints. The context includes the application of Kirchhoff's laws and concepts of series and parallel resistances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assignment of currents to branches and the division of current due to symmetry. There is a consideration of whether the circuit configuration allows for straightforward application of series and parallel rules.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the symmetry of the circuit and the implications for current flow, suggesting that certain paths may not carry current. Others are questioning the assumptions made about current division and the effective resistance between points.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of previous homework involving various resistor configurations, indicating a focus on understanding complex circuits. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the current division and the effective resistance, which may reflect the challenges posed by the problem's novelty.

bassist11
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I have a pentagram of resistors, one in each branch of resistance "r". Each joint is also connected to the two joints across from it but none of the wires inside the pentagram are connected. I need to find the resistance between any two adjacent joints.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Basically, I know I have to assign currents to each branch first and assume I know these currents because in the end they will divide out anyways. I know Kirchhoff's laws and how to add resistors in parallel and series. I'm just stuck on how the currents divide. Our teacher has given us an answer of 2/5 resistance and if you divide the current going in at one point into four due to symmetry, you won't get that.

Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what the circuit is you're describing, but it sounds like you might be in one of the configurations that is neither parallel nor series. In this case, you need Kirchhoff.
 
It is a "trick" problem. Either you see the solution or you don't. Letter the points of the pentagram ABCDE in order around the perimeter. Now, if you want to calculate the current from A to B, assuming they are the only connections to an external current source, start by ignoring the triangle CDE. You have one path of resistance r and three paths of resistance 2r. Now notice that the symmetry of the circuit means that you can't tell vertices C, D, and E apart. Each is the mid-point of one of the 2r paths, and each is part of triangle CDE. By renaming the verticies you can see that current won't flow in triangle CDE. (Or manybe you can't see it, a lot of students have trouble doing the mental gymnastics.)

So A and B are directly connected by a resistor of 1 r, and indirectly by three circuits of resitance 2 r. The easiest way to proceed now is to look at the currents. If r is 1 ohm, and the voltage from A to B is one volt, you will have a current of 1 Ampere through the direct path, and three 1/2 Ampere currents through the other vertices. Total current 5/2 Ampere, effective resistance 2/5 r.
 
That helps a ton^ When I was working it earlier, I kind of came to the same conclusion about no current flowing through that upper triangle. I think I just went wrong though when I divided the current into four when it comes in.

Would I be right in saying that the effective resistance is the same between any two points?

Our physics teacher has just been piling these "novelty" resistor problems on us.. We've done the cube, two infinite chains, a square, a diamond, you name it..
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K