Effective Resistance of Circuit: 4.4 Ohm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Icy98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The effective resistance of the given circuit is determined to be 4 ohms, contrary to the initial claim of 4.4 ohms. The calculation involves the formula 1/(1/6 + 1/4) + 2, which simplifies to 4 ohms when R3 is omitted due to being shorted by a wire. The presence of a 0 Ω resistor in parallel with a 2 Ω resistor further confirms that R3 does not contribute to the overall resistance. This conclusion is supported by the understanding that the potential difference across R3 is negligible, resulting in minimal current flow through it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law and resistance calculations
  • Familiarity with series and parallel resistor configurations
  • Basic knowledge of circuit diagrams and components
  • Ability to interpret electrical potential differences in circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of series and parallel circuits in detail
  • Learn about the impact of short circuits on effective resistance
  • Explore the concept of equivalent resistance in complex circuits
  • Investigate the role of ideal and non-ideal resistors in circuit analysis
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing or designing electrical circuits will benefit from this discussion.

Icy98
Messages
17
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


What is the effective resistance of this circuit?

Homework Equations


The answer given is 3A. so it means the total effective resistance is 4 ohm. But my answer is 4.4 ohm

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt:
1/(1/6 + 1/4)+2 = 4.4 ohm
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3970.JPG
    IMG_3970.JPG
    51.7 KB · Views: 460
Physics news on Phys.org
diagram/circuit?
 
andrevdh said:
diagram/circuit?
Thank you. I've just uploaded the picture.
 
Icy98 said:
1/(1/6 + 1/4)+2 = 4.4 ohm

Try to draw the circuit again, but "split up" the connection in point A. What happens with R3 and the connection at its right handside?
 

Attachments

  • pf_ss1.jpg
    pf_ss1.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 272
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1447232429.736911.jpg


Is this correct?
 
It is "shorted out" by the wire forming the corner, so there is in effect "no resitance" due to the wire. That means that you can redraw the circuit without the R3 resistor.
 
Icy98 said:
View attachment 91674
Is this correct?

You missed something. There is another cable/connection from point A to the other and of R3.
 
Think of electric current flowing like water from the + terminal towards the - terminal of the battery.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Icy98
What is the reason that we can omit R3?
 
  • #10
Icy98 said:
What is the reason that we can omit R3?

Complete the drawing from your 3rd post with the missing cable/connection. Then you will see.
 
  • #11
Icy98 said:
What is the reason that we can omit R3?
Good thread ! You really adapted quickly to the PF culture :smile: !

In the upper right of the original picture, there is a ' 0 ##\Omega## resistor ' in parallel with the 2 ##\Omega## resistor. Does that help ?

--
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Icy98
  • #12
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1447243370.396140.jpg


Is this correct?
 
  • #13
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Icy98
  • #14
Thanks a lot to stockzahn, andrevdh and BvU for helping![emoji16][emoji5]️
 
  • #15
It's a pleasure. The potential difference over a small resistor, or in this case the corner wire, is almost zero. That means that the potential difference over the R3 resistor is also almost zero so that almost no current flows through it. It is thus not contributing to the circuit and can be ignored or eliminated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K