Efficiency of the Rankine Cycle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency of the Rankine cycle, focusing on the calculations of work done by turbines and pumps, as well as the heat transfer involved in the cycle. Participants are analyzing enthalpy changes at various points in the cycle.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the work done by turbines and pumps using enthalpy differences but encounters issues with negative values and ratios greater than one. Some participants question the correctness of the starting equation and the signs used in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing corrections to the original poster's approach. There is a recognition of errors in the initial calculations, and guidance has been offered regarding the correct formulation of the efficiency equation.

Contextual Notes

The original poster references a source for their calculations, which they later question after reconsidering their approach. There is an indication of confusion regarding the physical meaning of negative enthalpy values.

TheBigDig
Messages
65
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A power plant operates on the Rankine cycle sketched below. The enthalpies at the four states marked 1,2,3 and 4 are:
h1 = 1200 kJ/kg, h2 = 2700kJ/kg, h3 = 1800kJ/kg, h4 = 130kJ/kg
If the overall efficiency of the cycle is 31%, calculate the enthalpy at point 5. Hence calculate the work ratio rw
Relevant Equations
[tex]\eta = \frac{W_T-W_P}{Q} = \frac{(h_3-h_2)-(h_5-h_4)}{h_4-h_3}[/tex]
[tex]r_w = \frac{W_T-W_P}{W_T}[/tex]
WT, the work done by the turbines, as the difference in enthalpy from point 2 to point 3
WP, the work done by the pumps as the difference in enthalpy from point 4 to point 5
Q as the difference in enthalpy from point 3 to point 4

Taking these I get h5 = -252.3kJ/kg. However, my work ratio is larger than 1 and negative. Also I'm not entirely sure what a negative enthalpy represents physically.

I was working from this source here: https://www.nuclear-power.net/nucle...y-of-rankine-cycle-equations-and-calculation/

241309
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your starting equation is incorrect. It should read:
$$\eta=\frac{(h_2-h_3)-(h_5-h_4)}{(h_2-h_5)}$$The heat added Q is ##h_2-h_5##. The heat removed in the condenser is ##h_3-h_4##. You also had the wrong sign on the work done by the turbine.
 
Thanks so much! Will try that out asap
 
TheBigDig said:
Thanks so much! Will try that out asap
Good. But do you see where you erred?
 
Chestermiller said:
Good. But do you see where you erred?
Yes, I had been blindly following the source I quoted but when I put a bit of thought into why it was wrong it was obvious.
4-> 5 the water is getting pumped at a high pressure (q = 0)
2->5 is where heat energy is added to the system to raise the temperature at a constant pressure (w = 0)
2->3 is an expansion through the turbine (q = 0)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K