Efficient Buffer Preparation: 500ml MgCl2, Glucose, ATP, and Tris-Cl at pH 7.8

  • Thread starter Thread starter vande060
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buffer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on preparing a 500ml reaction buffer with specific concentrations of MgCl2, glucose, ATP, and Tris-Cl at pH 7.8. Calculations for MgCl2, glucose, and ATP concentrations were shared, confirming the use of the dilution equation C1V1 = C2V2 for determining the required volumes of stock solutions. The participant is uncertain about using a previously prepared Tris buffer at pH 8.5 and is considering whether to start over using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation for pH adjustment. There is a consensus that C1V1 = C2V2 applies to molar concentrations without needing conversion to g/L. The overall calculations for MgCl2, glucose, and ATP appear correct, while the Tris preparation remains a point of clarification.
vande060
Messages
180
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prepare 500ml of a reaction buffer containing .82% MgCl2, 62.5 mM glucose, 950 ATP, and 100mM Tris -Cl, pH 7.8 Use the stock solutions you have prepared

we had to prepare in previous problems:

500ml 1.75M glucose
25mL 2.5% glucose
2L of 1.8 Tris, pH 8.5


Homework Equations


C1V1 = C2V2
Pka Tris = 8.1
glucose mol mass = 180.16
ATP mol mass = 507.8

------------


The Attempt at a Solution



my calculation for MgCl2:

.82% = .82g/100ml = 8.2g/L
15% = 15g/100ml = 150g/L

C1V1=C2V2

150*x = 8.2*500

x = 28mL stck 15% MgCl2

My calculation for glucose

1.75M glucose = 315g/L
62.5mM = 11.2 g/L

C1V1=C2V2

11.2*500 = 315*x

x = 17.7 ml 1.75M glucose stock

Here is my calculation for ATP

5mM ATP = 3g/L
950nM ATP = .00048g/L

C1V1=C2V2

3*x = .00048*500

x =.08ml of stocK 5mM ATP

My calculation for the Tris I am not sure about, can I use my original pH 8.5 solution the prof asked me to prepare, or do I have to start over with the Tris acid and base components and use henderson H equation? does this all look right so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C1V1 = C2V2 works for molar concentrations as well, you don't have to convert them to g/L.

My guess is you should prepare new buffer from HH equation.
 
Borek said:
C1V1 = C2V2 works for molar concentrations as well, you don't have to convert them to g/L.

My guess is you should prepare new buffer from HH equation.

is the rest of it right?
 
Looks OK, but I just skimmed.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top