Efficiently Simplifying Nested Logarithms: A Scientist's Guide

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter japplepie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the simplification of nested logarithmic expressions, focusing on whether such expressions can be made more efficient or simpler. The context includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning regarding logarithmic properties.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the outer logarithm can be of any base.
  • Others argue that while logarithmic conversion formulas exist, they may not lead to a shorter expression, indicating that "simplicity" is subjective.
  • A participant questions whether it is possible to reduce the number of logarithmic operations, positing that at least two logarithms will always be necessary regardless of the conversion.
  • Another participant agrees with the assertion that the number of logarithms cannot be reduced.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the expression cannot be simplified to use fewer logarithms, but there is some debate about the subjective nature of what constitutes a "simple" expression.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not address specific assumptions about the logarithmic bases or the forms of the nested logarithms being considered, leaving some ambiguity in the definitions used.

japplepie
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Outer log could be any base.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can convert it with the usual formulas for logarithms (do you know them?), but the expression won't get shorter. "Simple" is a matter of taste.
 
mfb said:
You can convert it with the usual formulas for logarithms (do you know them?), but the expression won't get shorter. "Simple" is a matter of taste.
There is no way to reduce the number of logs being done right? No mater what you convert it to, it will still use at least 2 logs?
 

Similar threads

High School Creating Log Tables: Briggs' 400-Year-Old Accomplishment
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
High School How to compare two huge numbers with nested exponentials?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Efficient Logarithmic Calculations for 0.3048 without a Calculator
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
High School Terminology for exponentiation and logarithms
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
MHB How to Solve for x in a Logarithmic Equation?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
High School Logarithms(i hope this is in the right section)
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
SImplifying logarithmic functions
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
High School Understanding Logarithm Functions: f(x) = log(100x)
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Can Logarithms Be Used to Solve a Tricky Exponential Problem?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Can Logarithmic Properties Simplify This Equation?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K